Steve They make much finer screens out of synthetics and metals that are used for the PCB business. I don't know squat about it other then what the Dow rep told me about the conductive ink. The spec says not for use on anything finer than 150um (micrometers) thread/openings sizes for the silver ink, about 1/170 inch per thread or hole, or 85 dpi of ink (0.117 inch hole to hole, 0.0058 inch hole size). I think that is fine enough for circuit board printing, though I'm not sure, that's why I'm on this list, I don't do it professionally <G>. The copper ink can use screens down to 125 um thread/opening size. The spec says the largest particle size is 29 um in the silver ink and 20 um in the copper. The rep said it was too big for inkjet nozzles, because of the particle size. Does anyone know what the inkjet nozzle sizes are? From what (little) I've read, the way they make flexible circuits is screen printing the conductive inks onto the flexible substrates. The reason I'm interested in printing onto screens is that I'm interested in screen printing PCBs in entirety. I'd still like to be able to (best case) run a blank piece of fiberglass or flexible substrate through my printer and get a complete, multi-layer, pcb out the other. My ideal would be UV hardening inks, with high power UV LEDs on the print head so that as soon as it prints, it starts getting cured. Then be able to multi pass print, where the ink reservoirs are filled with conductive ink, insulating ink, solder mask and component marking ink. Print conductors, print insulating layer for crossovers, print crossovers, repeat as needed, print ground layer, you get the idea. Problem is, they don't make UV curable conductive inks, since the metal in the inks blocks the UV penetration into the epoxy matrix, they only make heat cure and VOC based. So to give a short answer, if I can't print like I would really like, the next step back is doing it by directly printing the layers onto the screens, then using the screens to print the different conductive and insulative layers, drying between layers, then curing it all together. I don't want to mess with exposing the screens and developing them anymore than I want to expose, develop and etch the copper ;) I'm basically lazy and cheap. I want it, I want it now, I want it free and I don't want to work to get it. I will work real so that I can be lazy about something later. I could make pcbs the 'old fashioned' way, but I'd rather just have the pcb already. If I'm doing a design, that's what I'm concerned with, and interested in doing. At that point making a PCB is just a means to an end. Right now I'm in interested on how to make one off pcbs the cheap and lazy way, so it's got my attention. Later on, I'll just want the darn pcb, so I have to help figure out a real quick and fairly easy way to do it, now, so I can be lazy about it later. Take the last three or four paragraphs with grains of salt and smileys after every line. Except the cheap and easy one. Damn, I meant cheap and lazy. :( RM >Why would you print onto the screen? A screen has to be exposed just >like photosensitive PCBs so you print a transparency then expose and >develop the screen. > >It's been discussed here quite a bit, that fabric printing screens are >just not fine enough mesh to screenprint etch resist. > >If you mean can the screenprint inks be fed into an inkjet printer, >no, they are way too thick. > >I am going to try the pigmented inks I use directly onto a PCB. I am >assuming I'll have problems with puddling, so I'm going to start out >with a hot board and lay down very little ink for a start. I have some >thin PCB about the thickness of a business card, that should feed fine >in my printer. > >Steve > > >
Message
Re: Standard inkjet inks for etch resist?
2004-03-13 by Richard Mustakos
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.