yeah, ditto. I find the eagle autorouter pretty, well, stupid. If I route several of the obvious ones first, it often does a much better job. I also find myself going back and ripping up long circuitous routes (like a power route), routing it manually and then autorouting, the ar does a much better job. my wife was a pcb designer for 10 years and even the pricey stuff required a lot of fussing. she laughs at me when I complain about the ar in eagle, I feel like Rodney Dangerfield... Phil --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "javaguy11111" <javaguy11111@y...> wrote: > I have run into this problem but what you have described has not > worked well for me. I may define a power class with a 5mm trace width, > but that will not autoroute to a chip with a 1mm pin pitch. > > As my designs have grown more complex I have found the eagle > autorouter to be less and less useful and I have started routing > manually more and more. I wonder if the autorouters from the more > expensive software packages are more intelligent about such things. > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Ussery" > <uavscience@f...> wrote: > > > > You'll want to create different classes in the schematic. Type > "class" into > > the command line interface. A dialog comes up with class > definitions. You'll > > probably only have a "default" class. Define some more classes, > such as > > power, clock, etc. with the trace widths, clearances and drill > sizes you > > want. Then type in "change class". A menu with all the classes > comes up. > > Select the class you want, and then click on the schematic nets you > want to > > be the new class. Then go to your board and autoroute. The different > classes > > should show up with their different widths, clearances, and drills. > > > > > > - Robert > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: joshdewinter [mailto:joshdewinter@y...] > > >Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 7:06 PM > > >To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > > >Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Another Eagle question for the experts > > > > > > Thanks Phil, Javaguy and Rusty for the tips with Eagle. The via > > >thing was so simple, I didn't even think of doing it. > > > I have another one for you. I've read the manual and didn't see > > >it. You'll probably slap me for being ignorant, but here goes: > > > > > > How do you change the width of the tracks the autorouter uses? I > > >have tried changing the line width before using the autorouter, but > > >it sticks to the line size it appears to like best. If I group all > > >the traces and use the change tool after they're drawn, I get > > >overlapping lines if they get too big. > > > How can I specify lines with big width before routing, so the > > >autorouter doesn't overlap them? > > > > > >Thanks very much for the help
Message
Re: Another Eagle question for the experts
2004-02-12 by Phil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.