Phil, When I started trying to figure the toner fusing point, I went to the HP site and looked up the MSDS for my particular toner. I can't find it right now, but as memory serves me, they listed the softening point at 100 to 150 degrees C. Might give a decent starting point. It still gives a broad range At 06:14 PM 2/11/2004, you wrote: >If the only problem I was having is to fill in an occasional pinhole, >I'd call it good. Given the amount of manual fussing you have to do, >that seems a pretty minor point. > >I've been experimenting with this technique but have yet to get a >laminator becuase I've gotten reasonably good results from the iron >approach. It seems to me that there are a number of variables you >have to deal with. each one can ruin the process. > >1) fusing temperature >1a) toner fusing point >1b) fusing time >2) fusing pressure >3) thickness of toner >4) quality and cleanliness of copper substrate > >I think 2) is a huge issue in that there is fine line between too >much and not enough. I found that even modest pressure causes some >smearing of toner (and the widening of traces). Its my opinion that >little pressure is needed, you just have to ensure that the toner >makes contact with the substrate for a long enough time at the fusing >temperature. i.e., it has to melt and be in contact with the >substrate long enough. I've gotten good results with letting the >iron be all the weight needed. I also do not apply ANY lateral force >as that seems to cause smearing. > >Since I print on an inkjet and then use a copier for my toner >deposition, I am able to control the amount of toner pretty well. I >tried a non-scientific range of toner densities and found that you >want it to be fairly thick, especialy for large ground areas. How >ever, the thicker the toner, the easier it is to get smearing. less >pressure is needed in that case. > >It probably goes without saying but preparation the the board is >critical. I've gotten good results with a very fine emery cloth to >create a rough surface (i.e. significantly increase total surface >area to allow better toner bonding). > >Toner fusing temperature is tricky because different toners have >different fusing points and it appears the substrate material type is >a factor as well. For example, ricoh has a lower temperature toner >to allow shorter warm up times for their printers. does anyone have >pointers to information on fusing temperatures for varous toners? >I've googled until my eyeballs hurt and found only scraps of info. I >may just have to try an experiment. > > >Phil > Bubba OLDER THAN DIRT Country Bubba (Actually the inventor of Country and Bubba) In God We Trust axtein@... LaGrange, GA http://ns1.dicomm.net/~axtein/dro [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: AHHH!!!! Thermography looking like a better option
2004-02-12 by Art Eckstein
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.