If the only problem I was having is to fill in an occasional pinhole, I'd call it good. Given the amount of manual fussing you have to do, that seems a pretty minor point. I've been experimenting with this technique but have yet to get a laminator becuase I've gotten reasonably good results from the iron approach. It seems to me that there are a number of variables you have to deal with. each one can ruin the process. 1) fusing temperature 1a) toner fusing point 1b) fusing time 2) fusing pressure 3) thickness of toner 4) quality and cleanliness of copper substrate I think 2) is a huge issue in that there is fine line between too much and not enough. I found that even modest pressure causes some smearing of toner (and the widening of traces). Its my opinion that little pressure is needed, you just have to ensure that the toner makes contact with the substrate for a long enough time at the fusing temperature. i.e., it has to melt and be in contact with the substrate long enough. I've gotten good results with letting the iron be all the weight needed. I also do not apply ANY lateral force as that seems to cause smearing. Since I print on an inkjet and then use a copier for my toner deposition, I am able to control the amount of toner pretty well. I tried a non-scientific range of toner densities and found that you want it to be fairly thick, especialy for large ground areas. How ever, the thicker the toner, the easier it is to get smearing. less pressure is needed in that case. It probably goes without saying but preparation the the board is critical. I've gotten good results with a very fine emery cloth to create a rough surface (i.e. significantly increase total surface area to allow better toner bonding). Toner fusing temperature is tricky because different toners have different fusing points and it appears the substrate material type is a factor as well. For example, ricoh has a lower temperature toner to allow shorter warm up times for their printers. does anyone have pointers to information on fusing temperatures for varous toners? I've googled until my eyeballs hurt and found only scraps of info. I may just have to try an experiment. Phil --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon_heller@h...> wrote: > > >From: "joshdewinter" <joshdewinter@y...> > >Reply-To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > >To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > >Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] AHHH!!!! Thermography looking like a better > >option > >Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:35:49 -0000 > > > > I'm getting frustrated. I've tried all night (for several nights) > >to perfect my toner transfer process. I keep getting marginal > >results. I started with an iron. Eventually, I got a laminator, > >albeit a cheesy, low grade one. > > My results are not production grade, and it's frustrating me. > > [deleted] > > You are probably using the wrong printer, some are better than others at > toner transfer. > > Leon > -- > Leon Heller, G1HSM Tel: +44 1424 423947 > Email: aqzf13 at dsl dot pipex dot com > WWW: http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller > > _________________________________________________________________ > Find a cheaper internet access deal - choose one to suit you. > http://www.msn.co.uk/internetaccess
Message
Re: AHHH!!!! Thermography looking like a better option
2004-02-11 by Phil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.