I was going to use the photo-method as most of my stuff is in smd but ever since I got this perfected I think I'm gonna stay with the toner method. The key point about this way is putting the pcb on the iron and heating it up half way through the process. I also insert the pcb's diagonally so that more heat is transfered to more area on the pcb. I do another thing that works good...sometimes...for the large copper areas. Prior to mag-paper-pattern on the pcb I put the magazine paper with the toner pattern on the iron (toner side up)and heat it up until the toner gets glossy, this helps with the porosity issues sometimes and sometimes helps with distribute the toner a bit in the large areas. Does anyone know of a test standard for pcb traces etc. so that we could compare results of the different methods? Resc. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Derryck Croker <derryck@n...> wrote: > On 6/2/04 05:55, rescme1 at alram2@h... wrote: > > > Here are a few test etch's: > > Not at all bad - this is probably the best anyone will get with this sort of > laminator. Less fiddly than the photo resist route as well, which was my > goal. > > -- > Cheers, > > Derryck
Message
Re: Model of laminator used
2004-02-07 by rescme1
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.