Toner transfer is more appropriate for prototypes. Why? There are fewer steps with toner transfer - draw PCB art on computer, laser print it, iron on to PCB, remove paper, etch PCB. Silk screen is best for mass production. There are more steps: obtain silk screen and frame, photosensitize the silk with emulsion, draw PCB art on computer, print to transparency film, use that to expose the silkscreen, develop silkscreen, clean, then print PCB with silk screen ink, dry ink, etch PCB, remove ink from etched PCB. Clean ink from silk screen (if you want to use it again!) soon after last print made. The resolution attainable with silk screen depends on the "mesh" of the silk, that is (I think) the number of threads per inch of the fabric. I don't know the limits, but I think pretty good resolution is possible. I made some PCBs with silk screen 25 years ago; the technology was friendly, that is, with just simple instructions I was able to make the PCB's without much trouble. More equipment is required to do silk screen - silk screen and frames, work area for printing, some way to get the screens to hinge up, and some way to hold the pcb during printing, ink, squeegee, cleaning solvents, developer for photosensitive emulsion, the emulsion itself, chemical to clean screen if you are going to reuse it. All you need for toner transfer is an iron and toner transfer paper, which may be simple paper of various kinds. There is at least one member on the list who used silk screen commercially, so if you have questions, he has the answers. Grant --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Balan <balan3@y...> wrote: > Hi > > I am just learning the art of PCB making. Can Someone tell me is it possible to transfer etch resist onto a board using Silk screen and if possible what is the difference between toner transfer methord and the silk screen.
Message
Re: Silk Screen
2004-01-12 by grantfair2001
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.