Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Message

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: G-10 questions

2015-09-30 by Malcolm Parker-Lisberg

Paul
Just to correct your statement
"Then the boards were exposed to either direct sunlight or a bulb that had heavy IR content in it's light."

The resist is not sensitive to infra red (IR), it is sensitive to ultraviolet (UV).

Malcolm


I don't suffer from insanity I enjoy it!
Mene, mene, tekel, upharsin
The writing is on the wall.
Ha-ktovet al ha-kir

--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 9/30/15, palciatore@... [Homebrew_PCBs] <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

 Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: G-10 questions
 To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
 Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2015, 2:30 PM
 
 
  
 
 
 
   
 
 
     
       
       
       OK, I made PC boards in my garage back in the 70s.
 I used a variety of techniques. 
 
 First, you wonder how the copper got on the
 boards. Well, even back in those dark ages, you just bought
 them that way. The factory put the copper on them: I never
 even considered the possibility of doing it myself. Oh, they
 did sell pens that drew conductive lines, but I never
 trusted them so I did not even try them. It was a conductive
 paint, not solid copper. 
 
 You could buy either plain copper clad boards
 or sensitized copper clad boards. The sensitized ones had
 the photo resist already sprayed on them in a nice even
 coat. You needed a high density negative or positive,
 depending on the type of resist on the board. It was before
 the days of inexpensive computer CAD so I made 2 times
 actual size layouts using graph paper with a 1/10th grid of
 "drop out" lines. That means the lines did not get
 picked up on the negative or positive transparency which was
 the next step. I used drafting aids like black adhesive tape
 in various line widths and self adhesive doughnut pads and
 IC patterns. All of these were available from drafting
 supply stores. I carefully placed them on the grid with due
 care for trace separation. My primary tool was an Xacto
 knife. 
 
 Then that artwork
 was taken to a drafting or blueprint company who had a copy
 camera. That was a camera that had the lens, film holder,
 and art holders all mounted on floor tracks. It could make
 negatives or positives in exact geometric ratios. Since my
 original was 2X, I had 1/2 size negatives made. Of course,
 you could make your own negatives but then you had to work
 with 1X artwork on transparent plastic and a contact print
 frame. 
 
 Then the boards
 were exposed to either direct sunlight or a bulb that had
 heavy IR content in it's light. They were developed
 using a solvent solution and allowed to dry. Then placed in
 an etchant until the excess copper was removed. Then the
 resist was scrubbed off with steel wool or dissolved with a
 different solvent. 
 
 I also
 liked to use a tin plating solution to improve the
 solderability. Dip, wait two minutes, remove and rinse. 
 
 Finally, they were drilled
 with the various sized drills needed for the individual
 pads. 
 
 Or you could buy the
 plain boards and spray the resist on from spray cans. A
 company called Kepro had all these supplies, but they no
 longer exist. 
 
 Or you could
 use those self adhesive pads directly on the bare copper
 board to form the pattern on. This was OK for a one-off
 board, but tedious if you needed several. And the etchant
 could get under the traces where they overlapped a doughnut
 hole due to the height of that doughnut pad. 
 
 Another way was to start with
 the bare copper board (one side or two) and use a perf board
 to mark the pad locations. Then drill them. Then use a
 resist pen or a Sharpie marker to draw the foil pattern.
 Etch, clean, tin plate and use. 
 
 Others used other techniques. You could make a
 Zerox copy of the artwork and use an iron to transfer the
 toner to the bare copper board. I believe some people still
 do this today. Some retouching with a resist pen or Sharpie
 was generally needed. 
 
 Like
 I said, many ways, even back in that ancient era of the 70s.
 
 
 I assume you are trying to
 do this in an authentic manner, but back in the 70s I
 usually saved the PCB process for boards where I needed four
 or more identical boards. If I only needed one, two, or
 three I usually used the Vector slit and wrap, wire wrap
 pens. I built many professional projects that way. I made
 wire lists and was very careful in making the connections
 properly. I never had a bad WW board. 
 
 Paul A.
 
     
      
 
     
     
 
 
 
 #yiv9643158145 #yiv9643158145 --

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.