You don't need a pitch black and thick toner cover for UV, uniformity is more important, if your exposure is short. When I started doing UV I always printed 2 copies and aligned them for extra darkness and did a long exposure (2m30s), but now I only print one copy, works just as well with a short exposure (50 seconds under UV leds). I use dry film negative resist and tracing paper artwork. As for printers, I have several but the one i use mainly for this is a Brother HL5340D, with Toner save off and "Improve Toner Fixing" on, at 1200dpi. My MFC-7420 doesnt have an fixing improvement setting and the toner tends to rub off tracing paper too easily if I use that printer. At least here in NZ printers (laser and inkjet both) are pretty easy to come by second hand for between $1 and $20, buy one, use it, abuse it, strip it down for bits when you're done and move on to the next. On 17/10/13 13:28, beefyzee@... wrote: > > I thought because it had a resolution of 1200 x 1200 it may lay down a > decent quantity of toner but that's not the case. I've just got my UV > box and wanted to try my first photo resist PCB board but after > printing the pattern I hold the paper up to the light and I can see my > fingers through the toner quite easily. The light is > definitely getting through the "black" so I'm guessing the UV would > get past it too. > > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] I don't recommend this laser printer
2013-10-17 by James
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.