Not very practical. The electroless copper first laid down is very thin -- just enough copper to get electrical conductivity. Furthermore you have to have connections to all traces (no isolated traces) to allow the electroplating to occur. There is a variation though that has been used over the years. 1) dip the plastic PCB (already drilled) in an electroless solution to establish a conductive surface. 2) put on a reverse (i.e. traces are exposed, the rest of the bd is covered) resist 3) electroplate a working thickness 1/2oz, 1oz, or whatever thickness you're after (and since the holes are also conductive at this point, they'll be plated, too) 4) strip the resist 5) dip briefly in etchant to strip the electroless flash over the whole bd (remember it is quite thin and will etch away long before any significant etching takes place on the traces.) Regards, Charles R. Patton On 8/17/2013 3:00 AM, theminde@... wrote: > > Hello group. > > When manufacturers of boards plate through the holes they use some > kind of special fluid solution, this attracts copper thus the hole is > plated in copper. > > So I was wondering if it is possible to use the same solution to print > the actual pattern, afterwards transferring copper (sulphate?) to > build up the tracks. > > Regards > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Why not use plated-through hole technology to print a circuit?
2013-08-17 by Charles R Patton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.