As Steve stated, we need to move this topic to Inkjet_PCB_Construction group. I need a few days to refresh my memory. Thanks, Volkan ________________________________ From: brane2 <brankob@...> To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:08 AM Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Driving EPSON printeahd drectly- volkan sahin's email ? @Volkan Sahin: Thanks for your response. If by some "IP problems" you mean problems with Verilog/VHDL source for FPGA, I don't care too much about that. I hope you haven't been bullied by Epson about protocol technicalities and so you can clarify things there. As things were presented, it looks as each piezo has two parts: - one common to all piezos that is driven by a waveform on COM signal that does actual pumping the ink either in or out - per-nozzle signals that modulate common stream for each nozzle. Nozzles are driven serially through C/M/Y/K channel, two bits per nozzle. Start of the bits packet is signalled by "latch enable" and nozzles are fired simoultaneously with NCHG. Is this about right ? As I understand your data, COM waveform has to be shifted in somehow, and and you need 32 bits for that. Missing part is how and what exactly do they mean. Looking at waveform, it seems that each waveform has less than 8 segments and if each one is described by 4 bits, probably 2 are for length and 2 are for direction. But looking at the scheme it seems signal is driven by the hardware itself ( your board has push-pull for it), so it is unclear why and how would one have to shift its digital representation to the chip and why. Could you go over that part ( signal generation and their purpose ) more thoroughly ? [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Driving EPSON printeahd drectly- volkan sahin's email ?
2013-07-23 by Volkan Sahin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.