Todd, The panda is real. I had an opportunity to play with and feed seven of them in China. Bertho From: Todd F. Carney / K7TFC Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 04:54 On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 11:53 PM, Boman33 <boman33@... <mailto:boman33%40vinland.com> > wrote: > > As I wrote, I know it works but the question is why. Mine is not to reason why, mine is but to do or . . . hey, wait a minute! Actually, I suspect the viscosity and surface tension of the emulsion has something to do with how the spin-coating method works. It may also be that it does end up thinner the farther it gets from the center, but that it doesn't matter given the use and the pretty-course image resolution required. Back then, I found myself more concerned about the thickness of the copper than of the emulsion. The engineers I worked for had always used 2oz copper clad, and that's what they wanted me to use. I wanted to use 1oz copper because a) I could get more yield from the etchant, b) it etched faster, and c) because it etched faster I could preserve fine lines much easier than with the thick 2oz stuff. If etching takes too long, it begins to undercut the traces and then the resist flakes off on the edges of the traces for that reason. Thin traces, such as dogbones or "sneak-throughs," would just get torn up. But it didn't matter how much data or how many calculations of current vs. temp rise of traces of thinner clad, they insisted on 2oz. Neither did it matter that industry standard by that time (1984) was 1oz except for special applications. Even Coombs the Revered (author of the standard text on pcb design) could not move them. I was able to ramrod the abandonment of the spinner/liquid emulsion hassle and we started using laminated dry film. In that small industrial setting, spun-and-flung liquid emulsion was a real bother, but for the hobbyist I think it's not a bad idea, as long as you can put a spinner together for next-to-nothing. At some point, the cost of the apparatus (along with the minor hassle) and the emulsion chemistry makes presensitized pcbs a much better value (and much easier, too!). Just curious: is that a real panda in your avatar picture? 73, Todd ---------------------------------------------------------- K7TFC / Medford, Oregon, USA / CN82ni / UTC-8 ---------------------------------------------------------- QRP (CW & SSB) / EmComm / SOTA / Homebrew / Design [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Seno 100 photo resist applicator
2013-04-07 by Boman33
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.