Ok so it is strangely silent on this topic. So I will let you know what I am doing. I purchased a laminator from a place in Chicago called big lots. A store that buys discontinued things and sells for a reduced rate, I paid 29.95 US. The specs said that the maximum temperature is 100 degrees Celsius. So I tried the process on a copper clad board with zero results. Discouraged I left it and tried the iron method. I cannot get the results that many have experienced. The traces are fat and jagged, there are voids etcÂ… So when the thread on the laminator unfolded I was prepared to buy one at Staples if someone had proven that it worked. As usual no one has just a lot of speculation research, which to me is useless unless results can be verified. So I proceeded to take the laminator apart, which I had purchased. It has bimetal thermostat connected to a one shot that tells you when it has reached operating temp. I placed a switch to short out the thermostat and let it warm up 10 minutes and tried a board with glossy paper (national geographic in case anyone wants to try the same and it is easy to get). I ran it though about 6 times and placed it under water for about 5 minutes. I was surprised to see clear results however there were some parts that did not fuse to the copper so I determined that I need more heat. I placed the cover and let it warm up 20 minutes and found that the nylon gears melted on the rollers. So now I have to cast new gears and try again. So my question to ones that have successful laminators, what is the temperature that they operate at so that I can replicate the results???? --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Steve" <alienrelics@y...> wrote: > You know he has a point. After all, not all laminators are created > equal, and I don't recall this particular laminator being mentioned. > > I know I have a very good GBC laminator with adjustable temp, about 3 > or 4 years old, and after about 8 passes it still won't fully stick to > even one of those cardstock thin 1 oz doublesided boards. > > Steve Greenfield > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "dsv1486" > <darrell.vandenberg@t...> wrote: > > Dean: > > Appreciate the sarcasm, no really, however that is not the answer to > > the question. Has anyone gone out to staples, purchased the lam and > > tried a toner transfer. I have seen lots of stuff on the net about > > research, but little proof that can be validated. Have you done so???? > > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Dean Batute" <phix_it@y...> > > wrote: > > > Darrell, > > > a thread just finished DIRECTLY before your's. Not months > > ago, > > > nor weeks ago litteraly the posting before your's. Read the very > > > first message that began that Thread. Give you a hint...It was from > > > me. > > > > > > For every one else....funny wouldn't you say? Here I am...research > > > research research, read ,read read, do everything I can to find out > > > info on a topic that interests me. For some....well...??? > > > Sometimes I wish I wasn't a polite Englishman. > > > > > > > > > Cheers....Dean. > > > > > > > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "dsv1486" > > > <darrell.vandenberg@t...> wrote: > > > > Does anyone know if the Docuseal 95p at Staples will work for > > > PCB's. > > > > Has anyone tried it?????? I am thinking of purchasing one however > > I > > > > would like to know if it is worth it.
Message
Re: laminator
2003-11-05 by dsv1486
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.