Hi Robin, Thanks for the comprehensive info. Do you think a car quartz halogen headlamp would have sufficient UV output ? I have a new 12V dual filament 50W + 65W which I could parallel to give 115W Alternatively, I have a new 12W T5 circular (11cm 41/2") Fly Zapper tube. My PC is only 8cm x 3cm. The sensitised PCB needs energy around 360nm. Thanks, John --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robin Whittle <rw@...> wrote: > > Hi John, > > Generally, gas discharge tubes cannot be operated in parallel. They > need a high voltage to start, but settle down to a low voltage ca. 90 > volts (I guess) once they are conducting. With ordinary inductor > ballasts I have seen two 20W short tubes, each with their own starter, > wired in series with a 40W ballast. This is for 240V. Maybe that would > work with a high frequency electronic ballast. > > I chose to use a 500 watt floodlamp from the hardware store. The short > linear quartz halogen lamps give off a lot of near UV, which is what I > want for exposing Riston negative photoresist. > > At a distance of about 45cm I have exposure times of 2 to 3 minutes. > > This is a much narrower angle source of light than having a bunch of > fluorescent tubes only 10cm away, so for a given phototool and possible > distance from the phototool to the top and bottom of the Riston, I get a > much sharper image (shadow). > > The only potential concern I can think of is heating of the phototool, > PCB and whatever means is used to hold them together. I have a fan > blowing on them to keep them cool. > > There's no warm-up time for a QI light. Tubular fluorescent lamps are > likely to have some kind of warm-up time, making it difficult to predict > their light output unless they have just been running and are fully > warmed up. High pressure mercury vapor lamps have much longer warm-up > times, and so do the compact fluorescent lamps which are now widely > used. All these fluorescent lamps - tubular, 400W (or other wattage) > high pressure mercury vapor lamps, and compact fluorescent lamps - come > in "black light" versions which I think put out the ideal wavelength for > exposing Riston. > > > http://www2.dupont.com/Imaging_Materials/en_US/tech_info/datasheets/index.html > > I haven't looked at all the types, but the types I have looked at are > specified to respond best to 350 to 380nm light. This datasheet for a > 400W high pressure mercury vapour fluorescent H500-BL: > > http://www.eyelighting.com/tb/Mercury/MVR/EQS-N-52-78-69917.pdf > > shows most of the output at about 370nm. > > However, I think their warm-up times are a problem. > > QI lamps will vary their near UV output somewhat according to their > operating voltage, but unless the mains voltage varies widely, I would > be surprised if this variation was enough to cause trouble with Riston. > > > - Robin http://www.firstpr.com.au/pcb-diy/ >
Message
Re: PCB light box - hf ballast / tube wattage - 400W floodlight instead?
2012-08-01 by v321uk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.