Understood Robin, although I have not encountered problems with the Kinsten positive pcb in terms of registration or under-cutting etc. I must check my Riston stock for polmerization, as it is also of 1980s vintage. Last time I looked, about 7 years ago, it was still red. cheers Bill, VK7MX On 19/05/2012 12:31 AM, Robin Whittle wrote: > Hi Boman33, Don and Bill, > > I am responding to your replies to my message "Riston precoated FR4 in > Australia, Riston sheets and rolls". > > I am pursuing Riston, or potentially other negative photoresist films, > because its my impression it can reliably produce finer lines than the > other alternatives. > > For instance, from this list (2012-02-14): > > * http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs/message/29673 > > Bob Balderstone wrote to the effect that Toner Transfer was not as easy > or repeatable as Riston type laminated film, that spray-on or sponge-on > photoresists don't work, and that "pre-coated boards" (negative, > positive? - at least as distinct from laminating your own Riston > negative resist) were: > >>> Good sometimes but expensive and sometimes poorly cut >>> (raised edges have to be filed down before exposure) >>> and occasionally unevenly coated meaning it's hard to >>> get consistent results. My experience is they have a >>> shelf-life (older = longer exposure time) which again >>> causes inconsistencies if you don't make many boards >>> at one go. > I have read about toner transfer, and my impression is that it would be > tricky to get the transfer lamination process working reliably, with > expensive transfer film required for each attempt. Also, it is clear > from the Pulsar documentation: > > * http://www.pcbfx.com/main_site/pages/direct_etch/the_8min_pcb.html > > that the toner itself is not good enough, so there has to be a second > step of applying a "Green TRF foil" so the combined bonded "foil" and > toner will keep the etchant reliably off the copper. > > These steps involve melting the toner on a flat surface and pressing it, > so I would expect it to spread out and so make lines wider, with fuzzier > edges. > > If I can laminate my own Riston or similar to FR4 material, rather than > buy pre-laminated FR4 material, then I can choose whatever thickness of > FR4 I want, with one or two copper layers, with the copper thickness > whatever I want, without having bunches of laminated boards degrading > over time. > > I have some single-sided Riston FR4 from the 1980s. It is all > polymerized dark blue - so it can't be used. I understand the thin > mylar film is to protect the Riston from oxidation, which I guess causes > the photoresist to polymerize. I guess this can be avoided if the dry > film is stored correctly. Maybe it goes off after a few years, but the > dry film is cheap. Pre-laminated Riston FR4 boards are difficult or > impossible to obtain and would be much more expensive. > > The low cost and simplicity of Riston developer and stripper would be > hard to beat. > > There are plenty of etching options, so the remaining problems are: > > 1 - Choose and purchase some Riston film. I should have some 38 micron > MM540 in the next few weeks. > > 2 - Figure out how to laminate it onto single and double sided boards > - probably A5 size will be fine for me. I will write a separate > message about the laminator I bought today. > > 3 - Expose the Riston without too much fuss. I have a promising > technique which I will write to the list about once I have tested > it further. > > - Robin > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Why use Riston or some other negative photoresist dry film?
2012-05-18 by Bill Maxwell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.