A number of years ago, I had done some rough calculations and a bit of empirical testing (which turned out mostly unsatisfactorily), involving electrolytically regenerating spent Ferric Chloride solution. My approach involved electrolytically depositing the Copper out of the solution, and replacing it with Iron. The electrolytic deposition of the Copper did work (I ended up with some beautiful looking "Copper trees".), and the Iron anode did dissolve. There was little (if any) Chlorine gas evolved. But, I'm not real sure that the Iron that was dissolved formed Ferric Chloride, or some other allotrope (e.g., Ferrous Chloride, etc.). However, it may be worthy of further study. Note that one of the problems with etching Copper with Ferric Chloride solution is that the result is a Copper Chloride, as well as a Ferric Hydroxide (that brown, muddy looking stuff). The Ferric Hydroxide has to be removed from the active area of etching, or it'll clog up the etching process. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferric_hydroxide Theoretically, the Ferric Hydroxide could be filtered out of spent solution. Maybe. As for suspending boards, based on personal experience, Mylon is no good, since the Ferric Chloride will attack it. For that matter, Chlorine attacks a LOT of things. PVC, or PVDC, should be fairly good, since those have quite a few Chlorine atoms on the chain already. Dave
Message
Re: Rejuvenating ferric chloride etchants
2012-03-22 by Dave
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.