Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 19:38 UTC

Message

Re: Printers not making pattern opaque enough for UV process

2012-02-22 by tda7000

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, DJ Delorie <dj@...> wrote:
>
> 
> In cases like this, you really should consider buying a transmission
> step wedge.  I got a stouffer 21-step wedge for $7 plus s&h and it
> REALLY tells you how well (and accurately) your process is.  For
> example, my inkjet gives me an 8-step range, but my laser printer only
> gives a 3-step range.  Even the worst inkjet film I can print is going
> to be better than the laser printer.
> 
> I found that using "standard" software and films won't give you truly
> opaque prints.  I ended up writing my own printer driver just for films,
> and buying Jetstar films (perhaps anything with "ultra fast drying" in
> the name should work, but YMMV).  The specially coated films let me put
> much more ink than standard software would, resulting in a much darker
> film.
>

I didn't mention it before but I did a rudimentary test by covering the board with a credit card and exposing a little bit every minute for 7 minutes (chose that time as I saw a site where someone who made a UV box with LEDs say 7 minutes was the maximum they could go before overexposure)

It seemed that 1-3 minutes or so was underexposed, anything over that was good but had the speckling problem.

I tried putting the printer control panel on darkest. It didn't seem to make any difference. The film is designed for inkjets and appears to have a special coating.

A custom printer-driver sounds great, I don't suppose yours is available and is for Canons?

I wonder though if I somehow could force the printer to print black by mixing the colour cartridge it would be like getting 3 layers of artwork, from the 3 different inks. Not sure how to do that though.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.