--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, DJ Delorie <dj@...> wrote: > > > In cases like this, you really should consider buying a transmission > step wedge. I got a stouffer 21-step wedge for $7 plus s&h and it > REALLY tells you how well (and accurately) your process is. For > example, my inkjet gives me an 8-step range, but my laser printer only > gives a 3-step range. Even the worst inkjet film I can print is going > to be better than the laser printer. > > I found that using "standard" software and films won't give you truly > opaque prints. I ended up writing my own printer driver just for films, > and buying Jetstar films (perhaps anything with "ultra fast drying" in > the name should work, but YMMV). The specially coated films let me put > much more ink than standard software would, resulting in a much darker > film. > I didn't mention it before but I did a rudimentary test by covering the board with a credit card and exposing a little bit every minute for 7 minutes (chose that time as I saw a site where someone who made a UV box with LEDs say 7 minutes was the maximum they could go before overexposure) It seemed that 1-3 minutes or so was underexposed, anything over that was good but had the speckling problem. I tried putting the printer control panel on darkest. It didn't seem to make any difference. The film is designed for inkjets and appears to have a special coating. A custom printer-driver sounds great, I don't suppose yours is available and is for Canons? I wonder though if I somehow could force the printer to print black by mixing the colour cartridge it would be like getting 3 layers of artwork, from the 3 different inks. Not sure how to do that though.
Message
Re: Printers not making pattern opaque enough for UV process
2012-02-22 by tda7000
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.