On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:11:21 +0000, you wrote: >On 19/02/2012 15:57, Harvey White wrote: > >> >> For the quantities of board I use, if I had access to good >> photosensitive board in the sizes I need, I'd use it. That is, if it >> were cheap enough. I can get (locally) single sided 0.23 inch PCB >> which is ideal for making double sided boards. For some reason, I >> seem to make double sided more than single sided. >> > >Nearly all mine are single-sided. I do things like LCD display drivers, microprocessor boards, stepper driver boards, sensor interface boards, etc. Not a lot of analog wiring, mostly digital. I dislike jumpers, so the effort of making a separate layer is often worth the added step. Since my main techniques involve thin board epoxied together to make a dual sided board, I effectively make two boards to get one, but I can remake the "bad" one easily. Last run was 10 board sides, two stepper motor drivers, breakout board for a PCB drill, back panel for same, and a power distribution board. You pays your money.... etc. > >> My problems in photoetch are not the developer, nor the exposure (made >> a vacuum frame and use an enlarger timer), but the density of the >> positive. Neither the laser nor the inkjet seem to do quite a good >> enough job so far. Exposure therefore is tricky. I do miss kodalith >> a lot. > >As I've said several times, I get excellent positive transparencies with >a cheap HP 9540 inkjet printer and JetStar Premium film. I'll have to try that, and see if JetStar Premium is available here. That's when I start in with the photoetch, of course. Thanks. Harvey > >Leon
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Printer and Pulsar Paper
2012-02-19 by Harvey White
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.