A few bits of anecdotal experience and personal observations about photo resists (mostly from experiences 40 years ago.) 1) I always thought of photo resists as primarily polar (water soluble) and non-polar (organic solvent such as Toulene.) You chose the resist to match the need application. I.e., if you were going to make a silk screen to apply paint patterns, you chose a polar resist such as gelatin or polyvinyl alcohol because it was essentially immune to the petroleum solvents in the paint. If you were etching a PCB (that uses and aqueous solution) you chose a non-polar resist (Dychem aerosol) that required a solvent such as Toluene or Tri-chlor so it was completely immune to the aqueous etchant. 2) Having said that, it has already been mentioned the process of making printing plates. I knew nothing of how to make printed circuits so I thought of a local platemaking shop and went there to learn how to etch metal. It was an education. They got around the problem of an aqueous resist in a rather nasty fashion. a) The resist (I believe it was either dichromate sensitized polyvinyl alcohol or egg albumin) was flowed onto the zinc plate and essentially air dried at near room temp. b) The plate was then exposed with a negative and an arc lamp. c) The plate was washed with warm water to remove the unexposed resist. d) The plate was dipped in a chromic acid solution. e) The plate was placed on a flame burner and the temperature raised until the resist turned a dark chocolate brown color. At this point the resist is so totally cross-linked because of the chromic acid and heat so that no solvent, polar or non-polar will touch it. They etched with splash/spray of ferric chloride. An additional step was to powder the surface with "dragon's blood"(?) and by allowing most of it to slide off, then setting it with heat(?). That additional process could pretty much control undercutting, even when etching as deep as 0.050" or more. As previous posters mentioned however, that heat treatment is well beyond what a PCB can handle. 3) Later I learned the proper processes. We primarily used silkscreening with an asphalt like ink and bubble etched with ferric chloride. So the screens were make using di-chromate sensitized gelatin per 1) above being an aqueous resist worked very well with a solvent based ink. No high temperatures needed. The gelatin was coated on paper and we would dip it into ammonia dichromate, roll a plastic sheet onto the surface, and expose through a positive with an arc lamp. Basically the carbon tissue photographic process. Soak in water and wash off the paper sheet and unexposed gelatin. The pattern remained on the plastic sheet. Then press the pattern into the silkscreen. The other process was to sensitize polyvinyl alcohol and coat the silkscreen with it, dry, and expose, then wash it out. Either method worked. Presentized sheets were available but didn't have a good shelf life for our consumption rate. 4) The times we needed one-offs or finer lines we used the aerosol Dychem resist that we developed with trichloroethylene .(Tri-Chlor) The solvent based films were bad news as the solvents are/**/carcinogenic and bad for the lungs. The new films with carbonate developers I believe work on the principle that the developer is alkaline and the etchant is acidic so the PH controls whether the film stays intact. (someone more knowledgeable about this could certainly clarify this point.) Anyway, some notes from the dinosaur age. Regards, Charles R. Patton *//* <http://www.google.com/search?lr=&q=carcinogenic&start=0&spell=1>
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Photo Resist Gelatin Bicromate Process
2012-01-30 by Charles Patton
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.