POSITIV 20 negative photo resist doesn't work anymore. I believe the formula was changed a few years ago and now the method they recommend, the same has before, produces no results. Haven't found a cheap alternative that I can try yet. Having the board made TT method is my temporary solution for now. Nuno T. > -----Original Message----- > From: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Robert > Sent: segunda-feira, 26 de Dezembro de 2011 20:32 > To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Photoresist > > Hi, > > it's been years since I made my first circuit boards the old > fashioned way, carefully tracing over the artwork with a > sheet of carbon paper underneath onto the bare copper board > and retracing again over the pattern left from the carbon > paper using an etch resist pen and then using a #11 xacto to > gently scribe any excess ink from the edges of the traces, > touch up with pen, scribe, etc. until perect and then etch. > > ok that was 30 years ago and I want to make some new boards > now so looking at products ranging from DIY hobby to > industrial production, youtube videos and websites I am in a > better position to understand the processes now. basically > from what I gather the first step is the one with the most > variation, applying the etch resist to the board. etching is > still pretty much the same all around. > > there are 2 ways to go, either positive or negative photoresist, > > the former seems more straight forward considering the > artwork is unchanged, but the chemicals to apply positive > resist are expensive and not as readily available I am discovering. > > There is a discontinued positive resist spray that was made > by MG Chemical, and various liquid positive like Kodak KPR, > and POSITIV 20 photoresist lacquer spray available by mail > order from UK distributors. These all need to be applied in > dark room conditions and fully cured before developing, > possibly with heat from an oven. > the nice thing I think is that no laminating machine is > needed, since looking into that I find that "hot roller" is > the way to go and that can get expensive. > > > next is the dry film negative that must be applied with a > laminator, I see many videos showing DIYers running boards > through the laminators several times in an attempt to > compensate for low or uneven heat, something a more expensive > 4 Hot Roller laminator (Tamerica / Tashin TCC6000) would be > needed for even light production. > > when comparing the 2 methods it's possible to see pros and > cons in both, positive must have a dedicated darkroom to work > and negative is an investment into equpiment, namely a > reasonable quality laminator that new might run over $400 > > both need uv exposure but the latter need less power so maybe > the cost is offset somewhat not having to absolutly have UV. > > then it comes to what brand of dry negative resist? > > there are several including: > > MG Chemical > > Dupont Riston > > Kolon > > eBay nameless brands, etc. > > and then there are different types, thichnesses intended for > different processes, electroplating, sandblasting, etc. > > I'm skipping the part where the transparency is made, > guessing that would be fine just bringing the pcb file to > Kinko's or an Office Box store on a flash drive, or buying at > least a 600dpi, maybe even 1200dpi laser black and white > printer, ok for cad art, a scanner also for magazine or other > art. either pos or neg transparency for either spray > on/chemical or dry film, that I get. > > so my questions then are, > > anyone with any experience either with the positive resist > chemicals and/or the various brands of negative dry resist films? > > I'm looking for information beyond manufacturers claims and > DIY videos or websites to help in comparison of these 2 > photoresist methods and the various processes and products required. > > Many thanks and happy holidays to all, > > Robert
Message
RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Photoresist
2011-12-26 by Nuno T.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.