On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Les Newell <les.newell@...> wrote: > > > > To remove paint you just need to up the voltage - say 10kV or more. This > could be generated by a simple car ignition coil driven from an > oscillator. I have no idea how much paint would be removed on each > spark. It would definitely be a case of trial and error. > Having spent a great deal of time dealing with HV, commonly over a 75 KV, I can tell you that you are likely to have a huge problem with the selectivity of the spark that breaks the paint/insulation. Like lightning, it seeks the easiest path to complete the circuit and with any variation in the thickness of the paint at all it will tend to wander around where you're trying to target based on a number of variables like the thickness, air flow, the electrode shape/wear, and so forth. Then there's the issue of current supplied: you must supply enough current to vaporize paint, not knock tiny holes in it as it breaks down, but actually remove a significant amount of it. The more current expended, the larger the diameter of the spark, which accentuates your inaccuracy in targeting a specific point. The process at best would be inaccurate and slow since if you go too fast your electrode will heat significantly, pre-ionizing the air within the gap and adding another variable to the problem; go fast enough and you get an arc-welder :-) It's an interesting idea but I believe the amount of time to even get any kind of result (The setup for routing pulsed HV down to a point within a plotter would be hazardous to the electronics as it is) is somewhat daunting. I would really think skipping the HV part and doing the resist-scratch-removal process would be faster, easier, and far more precise. Larry
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Electrical Discharge Machining plus painted board plus CNC x-y table
2011-01-05 by Larry Battraw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.