i think i described it not precise enough.. (expected you know the bungard "barrel" exposure plotter). The idea is to put the film on a drum (before laminating). this drum rotates and a laser exposed one line a time. (this is what i THINK the bungard unit works - never seen one). for use in laser plotter i did think of somehow mounting the film on the photodrum and having it exposed by the laser. (tus no run through fuser etc.) - would require severe printer conversion thus a separate unit.... main problems: a) mechanical - just some tinkering b) more important for me: optical do you know if the laser wavelength, power/area, and exposure time may suit photoresist? i fear not. (sensitivity of photo-drum and film(at wavelength) would require comparision) I understand there would be alignment problems with double sided - but the alignment when exposing after lamination also needs care. if the laser in a simple and cheap laser printer would be suited to expose dry film without needing to change exposure time (much work i guess) it would be very interesting for me (you know i have a lot of problems with this plotter method) stefan On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:06:28 +0200, Markus Zingg <m.zingg@...> wrote: >> hi markus... >> >> i see, for hole covering it is a good method (maybe the only). >> i did know that but somehow didn't think of it.... >> but you all expose the film after laminating? > > Well - all - I don't know, but for me this is a must. Otherwise it > will not work. > >> maybe it can be exposed by putting it into a laser printer assembly >> before lamination? > > Well, never tried something like this and I highly doubht if the > laminage I use would survive the temperatures that the fixing unit of > a laser imposes. Apart of this - nice idea indeed. But then again, I > don't think that this would work out reasonably well when it comes to > double sided or multilayers because of the difficulties with > laminating this precisely enough. Laminating is a bit tricky - > especially if the envireonemental temperature goes above 30 degrees C > (86 degrees farenheit) as it happened often this summer. > >> i think you know the bungard "barrel" exposure unit? >> what do you think? > > No, not really. I use a home built exposure unit adn havne't looked > much around in this area. I also must say that I'm menawhile really > fully doing this the "chemical" way and so far I'm very happy. Once > you start to through hole plate, you need that many chemicals that > developing, exposing and makeing films etc. does not really matter > that much anymore. Of course I do agree that other ways could be > combined etc... > > Markus > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] dry film exposure - was: film processing
2003-09-29 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.