Chris Maness wrote: > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Russell Shaw <rjshaw@...> wrote: > >> Chris Maness wrote: >>> I made up a board on a CAD transfer program, and printed it off on a >>> transparency. I exposed it to my homebrew UV LED array for 1'30" and >>> transferred it to a store baught developer. I agitated it in the >>> developer at the recommended 10:1 concentration for well over 5 minutes >>> and the light sensitive coating showed no sign of coming off. I exposed >>> it again for a solid 5 minutes, and again put it in the developer with no >>> sign of any action. I have left in the back yard now to see if it will >>> finally come off. It does look like some milky looking material is >>> slowly coming off, but this is MUCH longer than I expected. I am asuming >>> all the positive boards require the same NaOH solution, so I don't think >>> that's the problem, but I am not sure. >> Positive resist or negative? >> > > I'm an idiot. I did not realize that there is a sticker covering the > sensitive side. However, after developing, my traces look a little on the > thin side. Maybe my masque was not dark enough, or I over exposed. I ran > 1m30s, using 15 LEDs on a 4x5 perf board. With the film still on, the traces get thinner due to light-undercutting travelling through the film under the track.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] First Masque Transfer PCB (it no worky)
2010-04-03 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.