On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stefan Trethan wrote: > I've tried direct inkjet back when Vokan presented his stunning results > here. Short story: it is possible, very promising, but much harder to > get right than toner transfer. I've put it on hold for now, since toner > transfer works well and my need for cheap boards has diminished. > > If you don't have the patience to get toner transfer to work, I would > not recommend direct inkjet. It is a lot more fiddly. > Instead why not use photoprocess with pre-coated boards? In what way is direct inkjet more fiddly? If you mean by aligning things, I can handle that. Most of the stuff I lay out is single-layer anyhow. I've thought of the photo process, but the price of pre-coated boards scares me off. I'd like to be able to cut a piece of board for what I'm up to and not have to waste an entire larger board for that. How about spray-on resist? > I'd give toner transfer another shot, the combination of right > pronter, right paper, right laminator, and right clean boards can not > fail. I'll be happy to advise if you line out what you have done so > far and what goes wrong, I've done a fair bit of messing about with > TT. I had a modified GBC laminator of the sort that Pulsar advocated. I haven't a clue where it wound up. Pulsar suggests that the laminator works with their product, but not with Press-n-Peel. I used an iron last night with Press-n-Peel and absolutely nothing transferred. -- David Griffith dgriffi@... A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] inkjet resist
2010-01-25 by David Griffith
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.