How about RTFQ? ;-) The section you linked to doesn't answer the question. Please re-read the question and check if it really does fit. Perhaps i just missed something. To clarify again, I want to remove the upper pad on _some_ components only. Others still need it, so setting the upper restring to zero in design rules won't work. Thanks ST On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Simao Cardoso <simaocardoso@...> wrote: > Brian Lalor wrote: >> Does anyone know if it’s possible to tell Eagle that standard holes >> for through-hole components aren’t automatically attached to both top >> and bottom layers? > > There is this simple, long used, funny English acronym: RTFM. Was a bit > over used by open source communities, and became unfriendly to newbies. > Maybe STFG/GIYF/JFGI should replace it now. > >> I ended up with an isolated ground plane on my first board. > > http://www.cadsoft.de/faq.htm.en#06013001 > > > If you want to use the autorouter for single layer, some people use > tRestrict layer (41) to avoid top tracks. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links > > > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] non-plated-through holes with Eagle
2010-01-21 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.