Mike Putnam wrote:
doing fine work.
had have a year ago, i wouldn't have said anything in the last year.
At least someone has now said that they can do fine pitch work with a
laser. Why do i have to go to these lengths to extract this simple bit
of information? How can i reliable reproduce the results? Has anyone
done fine pitch work with a 1200dpi lexmark?
> "Russell Shaw" wrote:I said i'd shut up about inkjets being the only viable alternative to
>
>>I've used laserjets, but the results were hopeless. What model is yours
>>and how old is it? Genuine toner?
>
> Didn't you say you would shut up on this subject in an earlier post?
doing fine work.
> This has turned into a "printer wars" group...Why hasn't anyone ever said how fine they can go with a laser. If they'd
> What say you Steve? Isn't it time to shut this one down?
had have a year ago, i wouldn't have said anything in the last year.
At least someone has now said that they can do fine pitch work with a
laser. Why do i have to go to these lengths to extract this simple bit
of information? How can i reliable reproduce the results? Has anyone
done fine pitch work with a 1200dpi lexmark?