[ Yep, I'm resurfacing after some time :-) ] Instead of transparencies, I usually use Avery 3276 Inkjet Decals for Windows (the traditional glass Windows, not the Microsoft type). [ I like to ensure that the board will not slip relative to the transparency and have found that scotchtape on transparencies leave marks (lines of copper) in the resulting board. ] I found excellent results some months ago with a friend's HP930c inkjet and these decals. But that was in another state. Here, I've recently started using a LaserJet 5L (paid $40 for it, including toner) with the same (inkjet!) transparencies, and so far have successfully done a 15-mil board at 600dpi. I have not found these decals specifically for laser printers anywhere. For PCB's and other reasons (front panel transparency masks), I've been desperately looking for a low-cost printer that prints very dark, but oddly this one does not, yet gives me good results with PCB's. I'll need to try smaller traces/spaces to see if I can successfully do 10 mil or less. Cheers, -Neil. On Sunday 29 June 2003 20:37, Adam Seychell scribbled: > I've seen many poor prints from inkjets too. The trick is to use > the corrct ink/printer and transparency combination. The > differences between the worst and the best is incredible. > > rolanyang wrote: > > It's not that I've had amazing success with laser, but I > > haven't ever been able to make a quality transparency > > with the inkjet (Epson 800). It may have been the print > > mode or the plastic material, but the final art has > > always been somewhat ... transparent :( > > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, adam Seychell > > <adam_seychell@y...> wrote: > > Professionals use inkjets when > > > >>it comes to making photomask for silk screening, ect. > >>If you have had good success with laser printed photomasks, > >>then please tell us more. > >> > >>With the epson inkjet/epson transparencies I can expose > >>boards at least five times the normal period and still have > >>perfect masking of the image. The only problem with such > >>long exposures is excessive light undercut. > >> > >>rolanyang wrote: > >>>Laser printers can be bought for roughly $100 these days. > >>>It's hard to beat the consistent output and quality > >>>of toner on transparencies. Also, if you're adventurous > >>>enough, they are good for direct iron-on transfer to PCB's. > >>> > >>>At that price, it's almost not worth hours of fiddling > >>>with inkjets - unless someone figures out how to > >>>do the direct inkjet resist to pcb method. > > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses]
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Inkjet Transparencies
2003-06-30 by Neil
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.