"martin_schoenegg" <Martin.Schoenegg@...> writes: > No this only means, hat you can adress this resolution. May be the > stepsize comes in this region, but there is nothing said about the > size of one pixel. Especialy inkjets are designed to produce Well, yeah. Relatively speaking though, I can compare 0.833 mil to 0.174 mil and say "it's much more accurate". What I really mean is that the line sizes - as drawn - will be much more consistent, because a variation of one pixel is a much smaller percentage of the line size. This means that, if I know my process can handle 6 mil lines, I won't have to worry about the 5 mil lines, or the spaces between 6.666 mil lines - because the films will more accurately reflect my desired sizes, compared to a laser printer. My inkjet is good to about 0.5 mil as far as drop placement accuracy goes. However, I know that "fuzzy edge" will be in the same spot every time. So, if I know I can do 6/6 rules with a 0.5mil fuzzy edge, at least the results will be consistent - a one pixel difference is negligible. One pixel on a laser printer is BIG compared to what I'm trying to achieve. On a laser printer, for 6/6 rules (er, 6.66 rules), off by one pixel means the line is 25% smaller. On an inkjet, off by one pixel would only be 5% smaller.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: How fine can you etch with toner transfer?
2008-10-23 by DJ Delorie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.