DJ Delorie <dj@...> writes: > I've got some preliminary (i.e. unetched) results. > > See: http://www.delorie.com/pcb/inkjet/ And finally, etched results are there too. Adam - I used the wet-lamination technique. The results were nearly perfect (more heat next time, one of the unattached pads floated away during etch, leaving the copper therein to get etched away). It also let me use some old 0.063" stock, which won't fit through my laminator. Any tips for doing double-sided boards this way? The second side was harder due to the board being more slippery, and trapped water in the pre-drilled holes kept steaming the film away from the board. Fine line tests - I think had I left it in the etch tank longer, 4/4 would have worked just fine. I'll have to include another test patch on the next set of boards I do. 6/6 was perfect and 5/5 again needed more etch time. About the comb edges - the film seems to have smoothed that out, leaving professional-looking edges on everything. Even at 200X they look smooth. Overall - aside from the one floating pad and the fine-trace test patches, the rest of the board looks perfect. MUCH higher quality than with toner transfer. Next time, though, more time in the etch tank, and more heat putting down the film. Now I'm considering getting some solder mask film too :-)
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: inkjet resolution (was: UV LED box)
2008-06-28 by DJ Delorie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.