DJ Delorie wrote: > DJ Delorie <dj@...> writes: >> Anyway, I'm investigating gutenprint and the printer's language to see >> if I can write my own driver that does what *I* want it to do. Yay >> open source :-) > > I've got some preliminary (i.e. unetched) results. > > See: http://www.delorie.com/pcb/inkjet/ > > What I did was modify the print driver to think it needs to print > every single pixel (which would normally be too much ink). Then I > wrote a program to remove half the pixels from the "field" away from > the edges. That way, I don't get dithering near the edges (clean > edges) but I do away from them (not too much ink). > > I was able to write my own software to send data to the printer, and > indeed I can control every single drop of ink, but unfortunately the > inkjet is itself incapable of better precision (mechanically) than > what you see in the photographs. Unfortunately, my micro-weave > algorithm is much worse than gutenprint's one, so until I can copy > that to my software, I'm still printing with the gimp. > > I might try letting it print every dot anyway, just to see how bad it > gets. I worry about ink bleeding causing breaks in the copper traces. > > I think this is as good as it mechanically gets. If you use the gelatine coated film that absorbs ink, you won't get bleeding.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: inkjet resolution
2008-06-27 by Russell Shaw
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.