DJ Delorie wrote: > > The inkjet does the same thing, even though I know the driver isn't > dithering it. Apparently, the print head just can't shoot ink drops > accurately. > Thats what I have observed too. If you look at it under a microscope then you can clearly see that line edges parallel to the print head travel axis are much less jagged than line edges perpendicular to the print head travel axis. It could be that the droplets are not landing on the paper at the precise time. Maybe air currents play role here. It would be interesting to override printer control and allow the head to move 1/10th its normal velocity and see if it improves the effective resolution. I'm sure most printers do not print at the resolution manufactures claim. I see pixelation errors when printing 6mil (0.2mm) lines from my Canon MP810. This printer is rated at 1200dpi (7 pixels in one 8mill line) yet I see some lines are significantly wider than others indicating the printer software is down converting the image to a lower resolution. Normally the effect isn't major but visible under a microscope. The image files in question are 1200dpi and do contains correct number of pixels. Adam
Message
inkjet resolution (was: UV LED box)
2008-06-23 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.