----- Original Message ----- From: "Dylan Smith" <dyls@...> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 10:00 AM Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: New Member > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Stefan Trethan wrote: > > [Eagle] >> fitting to me. Frankly i don't know what they are doing all day, the >> software looks and works as if it hadn't changed a bit since MS-DOS >> times. They seem to feel no need for improvement from their side, >> instead expecting you to use or possibly even write ULPs. > > Someone in alt.sysadmin.recovery remarked on looking at a vendor - check > their laurels, and if they are flat, avoid that company because they've > been resting on their laurels far too long. > > Sounds like Cadsoft have been doing just that. The Pulsonix software I use and the cheaper Easy-PC, from the same company, were both developed using C++ and proper OOP techniques. Both are regularly upgraded with new versions every couple of years. The few bugs that users come across are fixed immediately if they are serious, or a workaround is provided, often in 24 hours. Leon -- Leon Heller Amateur radio call-sign G1HSM Yaesu FT-817ND transceiver Suzuki SV1000S motorcycle leon355@... http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: New Member
2008-03-26 by Leon
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.