Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 23:05 UTC

Message

Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Homebrew through plating station - sucess!

2003-06-08 by Markus Zingg

On Sun, 08 Jun 2003 09:29:09 +1000, you wrote:

>
>
>Markus Zingg wrote:
>>>Markus Zingg wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> You are right, I am using palladium activation. The palladium is 200
>> EUR per 0.5 liter. That's expensive, but my 2.5 liter tank only needs
>> 125ml per load. The remaining part is filled up with the pre-dip
>> solution which is a lot cheaper. That said, the 200 EUR palladium is
>> sufficient for four loads which last quite a while.
>
>Thanks for the price info. I'd expected that price range. I 
>remember once a friend looked into doing his own through 
>hole plating using conventional electroless copper and got a 
>shock when the sales person faxed him the prices :). You 
>point out that the economics going down this path yourself 
>is still small compared to professional made boards, which 
>is all the matters at the end of the day.
>
>I guess the importnat thing now is to take extra care not to 
>comtaminate the palladium solution.

Yes, of course. I added covers to all tanks, and take extreme care to
follow the process specifications to the letter.

>There is really no alternative because its not likely your 
>going to develop your own chemistry and go through the years 
>  of research that the manufactures once did. Its taken 
>decades for these alternative electroless copper systems to 
>make it in the industry. If your are interested in the 
>subject you might like to read;
>
>http://nr.stic.gov.tw/ejournal/ProceedingA/v23n3/365-368.pdf

Very intresting article! Too bad it's quite short on the methods. The
palladium as well as the pre dip bath smell like vanilla - so I FIGURE
my solution uses the Palladium method which mentiones vanilla...

Again, I'm happy that it works now and currently I really don't have
the time to delve into this.

[snip]

>The strip solution is not critical, but from what I've read 
>on all dry film data sheets is the developer should be 9 to 
>11g/L NaCO3. If the instructions say 20g/L then use that.
>For my developing method I pour 500 ml of warm water into a 
>plastic tray and then add 50 ml of concentrate stock 
>solution (100g/L NaCO3). I drop in the PCB and gently brush 
>over with a 50 mm wide paint brush until I can clearly see 
>all the copper. Then I continue brushing for another minute 
>just to make sure all the (unexposed) resist is removed. 
>I've had problems with resist residue if I don't do the 
>extra brushing. Then the board is quickly rinsed and goes 
>straight into the etchant. I found the resists can swell a 
>the edges if rinsed for too long a time in fresh water. Once 
>the bard goes into the acidic etchant then the resist film 
>returns hard again.

I too use a wide paint brush and do it quite similarly. Intresting
observation with only rinsing it shortly. I will try this and see if
it changes the quality of the final PCB.

Markus

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.