You guys made me curious. I downloaded and tried Diptrace out (went through the tutorial etc.). I do not agree that it is soooo user friendly compared to Eagle (as strange as this may sounds). Don't get this wrong. It's truly ok for the money but for instance, I particularly find it clumsey to assign values to parts and make this visible in the schematic entry program. You really have to go through too many mouse clicks for such a frequent operation. I liked some other features though (i.e. some more intelligence moving around parts that are already have connections etc.). What I also miss (ok, might be that I just don't know how to do it) is the ability to enter purchase department oriented information for parts. I'm not totally fluent in english, so please bear with me when I now try to explain what I mean with more words than otherwise needed. Anyways, from personal experience I just know that having the information ready to actually order parts for a production run of a design is a painfull, time consuming process. I expect from a modern CAD package some support here. Like being able to define (multiple) suppliers for a part, entering price per quantity information, datasheet URLs etc. etc. and having a process thereafter that allows to make intelligent orders. Eagle has solved this with a ULP (but IMHO that should be part of the base product but that's a discussion we had already in the past). What I also miss is a similar feature like the ULPs in Eagle. Well, one should be able to "add" individual functionality to a package as it's possible with Eagle. Diptrace does have the ASCII export feature which could be used to modify the database and reimport, but that seems a little complicated let alone the fact that the data format does not seem to be documented (as oposed to Eagle). Doing layout work also is not as easy as it is in Eagle. However, I DO like the fact though that this seems to be a competition for Eagle and I would recommend the package to someone looking for a good package on a budget. Besides it seems to be a relatively new product, so we may will see progress in the future. Just my 2\ufffd of course. Markus Dave schrieb: > > > > phildimond wrote: > > Dave - can I give you the same pointer someone else on this gave to > > me? I've been down the KiCAD / AutoTrax / Eagle / etc path. Have a > > look at DIPTrace: http://www.diptrace.com <http://www.diptrace.com> > - has a 250 pin freeware > > limit, but the pricing is quote reasonable for larger versions. > > > > Phil > > > Wow! I just installed this and talk about user friendly. I had it > figured out in 10 minutes how to work it. Very nice indeed. Of course I > will need to design my circuit now and see how many items are available > in the libraries and if any are missing how to make them etc...Thanks > again for the info. :) > Dave > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: KiCAD
2007-11-29 by Markus Zingg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.