"Steve Wiseman" <sjwiseman@...> writes: > Do you have links for complex stuff? The really interesting boards are all NDA. I have them so I can fix pcb bugs. Suffice to say, one of them was the reason PCB can do more than 16 layers. > Then again, my first real gEDA project ought to be a toy, rather than > a 12-layer 4-thou uBGA monstrosity, I guess :) 12@4 isn't that hard for PCB. I think the prime factor at the moment is how "busy" your ground/power planes are, because of how we manage polygons. > trace spreading, trace fattening, trace centring, I've thought of these. The global puller was supposed to be that, but I discovered that the always-arc technique I used produced good results with a lot less work. I still want to do that, though - something like "copper hates other copper, proportional to how close they are, up to a point". So, you'd say "I can do 8/8 rules, but I'd prefer 20/20 when it fits". You'd want automatic necking too. I figured out the math once, but never wrote the code. > teardrops Got that one. At least, for the types of teardrops I like. There doesn't seem to be a "standard" for teardrops. Mine are designed to minimize mechanical strain between the trace and the annulus. > and pad expansion, That can probably be a plugin. "expand pads to the most that our space rules allow" would be easy. Checking for traces between would be harder, but not a lot so. > solder thieving, Which kind? > copper balancing, etchant use minimisation, What I do is just plop a rectangle over the whole board when I'm done, that fills in all the big areas with copper. > It might be easier to do it by hand, if the board's > small... Rules-based stuff is hard, and people are clever. I think some of those are better as house-specific plug-ins, too. Part of our (pcb's) task is to provide the right hooks to make writing those easier. > For sure - teardrops are great. They can be bettered, though. I once thought of a plug-in that fattened the traces leaving all vias to the diameter of the via's copper, for a short distance, when the rules allowed it. > And, interestingly, real PCB shops don't care if they're there or > not. Holes are drilled before etching (to allow PTH), so the via > pads don't break out enough to be worth protecting. It wasn't the drilling. I was removing a jumper block and the abuse fractured the connection.
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: PCB DESIGN industry standard
2007-11-13 by DJ Delorie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.