It looks like I've nailed down a reasonably reliable process for making boards with the Pulsar paper after not too much trial and error. I have learned a few lessons that I'll pass along in case they help someone else: * totally forget about using an iron - you need a laminator * the GBC H210 laminator CAN NOT handle 1/16" board (1/32" works) * the Green TRF film makes a huge difference in trace quality * 1:2 muriatic/hydrogen peroxide rocks as an etchant! * you have to run whole sheets of Pulsar paper through - no "cutouts" Let me expound a little on #2 and #5... #2 - Maybe some people can get 1/16" (0.062") PC board to run through their "TIA Laminator" (aka GBC H210), but I certainly couldn't. 0.032" board (1/16") is a bit too flexible to use for SMT designs but it is totally adequate for prototyping designs before sending them off to a board house. #5 - Earlier in this thread I complained about how the toner wouldn't transfer evenly, leading to spotty/broken traces. Once I ran full sheets of the Pulsar paper through, instead of cutting out pieces just big enough to contain the board image, I got great results. Of course this means that a lot of paper gets wasted. Still, at a $1.50 a page it's a lot cheaper, and faster, than sending Gerber files to the board house.
Message
Re: Pulsar's "TIA" Laminator - any good?
2007-06-08 by Jeffrey Jenkins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.