twb8899: Your technique is probably the most "professional" that I've read about on this forum. Negative acting resist may have an edge over the positive stuff, and may produce better products. I don't know if "Resiston" or any of the laminated resist materials are still being made, but this stuff worked really good. But one needs to have a dry film laminating setup to use it. I recall the excellent results that Kodak KPR resists could produce, but alas, the Feds said it was too nasty and Kodak moved away from it, although I think some version of KPR is still being made for the microcircuit fab industry, but not generally available to the public. A lot of microstripline work used to be done using the photo plotter methods you described, but I've been divorced from that area for so long, I don't know what they are using now. It might be interesting to set up a plotter using an LED "pen" in a dark box to plot on sheets of litho film and then develop the film in AB litho developer. I think such a setup could produce some really high contrast PC artwork. Having done "tape-up" artwork as large as 10X, and having it reduced to Actual on a big copy camera, I have a feeling for the accuracy one can obtain from the methods you described. Good Show! Roland F. Harriston twb8899 wrote: > > > I use photo plotted film negatives with negative acting dry film photo > resist. Expose with 1 kW mercury vapor bulb for 17 seconds. Etching is > with ferric chloride at 110 degrees F in a small spray etcher. I use > negative acting resist because it's lower cost and exposes much faster > than positive types. Almost never have any rejects using this method. > My production is 10 to 50 boards per lot with nearly 100% yield every > time. > > Find a supplier in your area with a photo plotter to make your films. > If that's not available plot the design at 2:1 scale with black ink on > white paper and have a printing shop shoot a negative film at 50% > reduction on their camera. You will have a high accuracy master film > that will last for years. > > Do some research on D-min and D-max concerning photo films. It's the > measure of density in the clear and black areas of the film. The > biggest problem with laser and ink jet printing is not enough D-max or > very dense black areas. Shine a lamp through the black areas of your > film and look at it with a maginfier. This is what your photoresist is > seeing and it's usually not dense enough for a proper exposure. > > Tom > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com>, "lcdpublishing" > <lcdpublishing@...> wrote: > > > > Hi guys, > > > > I have almost given up on direct ink-jet resist and on "plotting" > > with Staedtler pens using the CNC machine, and I am about to abandon > > toner transfer. Only problem with toner transfer is the "scaling" > > issues either through the printer or from the paper not being stable > > which causes problem with CNC drilling. > > > > Anyway, I ordered up some negative type resist chemical, the > > developer, a lamp, and an exposure frame. I am not expecting this > > to go "perfectly" either, but am hoping to have a bit less > > frustration in other areas. > > > > I am thinking the best accuracy I can get when printing is to use an > > ink jet printer (I have Epson R220 and Epson CX6600). I have a PDF > > editor program that allows me to edit trace colors and back ground > > colors so that I can make negatives so that shouldn't be a problem. > > > > The first "problem" I suspect I will run into is getting enough > > density on the transparency to make sure the "black" areas are dense > > enough to block out the UV exposure lamp where needed. Has anyone > > run into this issue and how do you deal with it? > > > > Any other pointers would be greatly appreciated as well as this is > > my first time for "photo-processing". > > > > Thanks > > > > Chris > > > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Photo-resist etching questions....
2007-05-20 by Roland F. Harriston
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.