Len Warner wrote: > >Len Warner wrote: > > > >And thats why you label your containers, with poison signs. > > > > > > [snip] small children don't read - but the[y] do recognize shapes and > > > they do investigate many things by putting them in their mouth. > > > >The labeling is for the sake of people who can read and interpret danger > >signs. As for the remaining people, you simply make the substance > >inaccessible to them. This is common sense. > > As would be NOT using food containers or other insecure > household containers, if common sense were as common > as its name implies and distributed widely enough to have > reached your neighbourhood in quantity. > Secure? I remember seeing pure copper hydroxide sold at the garden store in plastic bag inside a cardboard box. Sure it had all the regulatory labeling signs, but secure, not. The only difference between poisons rated packaging and non-poisons packaging is the word "poison" is often molded into the container. Many a food container are perfectly ok for storing chemicals such as copper hydroxide. In most cases the only difference between food and chemical packaging is the labeling. This is why I say its ok to store PCB hobby chemicals in suitable food containers. Adam
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Re: Disposing of Chemicals
2007-04-20 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.