> derek wrote: > > <SNIP> > > The etched board looks like it was from > laser artwork. The undercut is no greater > than the width of the jaggies. Why would > the undercut be any greater with a 5 mil > track? I don't think yor undercut has to be any wider than Adams photo shows his "jaggies" for it to be marginal at 6 thou does it ? Those jaggies in the perpendicular photos look like they are 25% of the 5 thou track width. I would consider a track that came out 25% undersized compared to another track on the same board was a failure. Does the Epson peizo print head have less scatter of dots than the Canon Adam uses ? Your photos of the 6/6 artwork certainly look less jaggy than Adams. > <SNIP> > > Why on earth should I get rid of this > bubble etcher in favor of a spray etcher? Not saying you should. I am saying my bubble etcher is bad and I need to get a new etcher. You obviously have a better bubble etcher than I do. In my case the bubble etcher will fully etch a stripe down one side of a board in 1/2 the time it takes the middle of the board to etch.
Message
Re: printer limitations or etch undercut
2007-04-11 by Andrew
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.