it is nice to see this here. i have also seen this effect of stronger exposure in the center. i have used a setup with distance about the same as pcb with. i used a nitraphot 200W photo exposure lamp. i think this gets only visible if you have the exposure time on the too short edge. i never again have seen this error (but i increased distance, made smaller pcb, and had to increase exposure time). the nitraphot is also no good lamp for exposure. but there is a reason for using a point light source: if you use some fluorescent tubes you have a wide area of light emitting surface. if you look at one point at the film/pcb you can see different lightbeams fall on it, from different angles. if your film does not perfectly lie down on the pcb it will make a "washed out" edge there. this would make the tracks smaller. each pcb has some sort of uneven surface. i think this also depends on your overall setup how strong this effect is (and on pcb quality). a friend of mine uses because of this effect a setup with a daylight halogene bulb. this bulb is relatively cheap (75eur) and works directly from mains. but you would need a fan with this, it gets very hot. this i think is the only reason for using a point source is better. i have seen some description for making the light of the fluorescent tubes more parallel at think and tinker i believe (not sure). it is fine this setup works fine for you, i only wanted to say that i have also seen the problem with stronger exposed center (you also can calculate this) but i found it only happening in "borderline" cases. regards stefan 18.05.2003 20:52:25, Hans Wedemeyer <hans@...> wrote: >Mike, >H'mm as I have pretty good looking boards and can do 5 mil all day long >! > >Here's an example http://hans-w.com/pcb_harwin_rivets.jpg > >I've only been using Round Bulbs of various types for about 27 >years...... >I like the short exposure time and never have noticed the effect you >menitoned, my largest board size >is about 6"X7" and it exposed uniformly. > >Just what is it about my boards that you think would make them any >better ? Please explain ! > >Hans Wedemeyer > > >Mike Putnam wrote: > >> Hans, >> I looked at the picture of your UV exposure setup. I just wanted to >> comment >> that I would never use the round bulb. Use the florescent tubes and >> your >> results will be better. I have found that the round bulb tends to give >> more >> exposure in the center than at the outer edges. Even more apparent >> with >> larger boards. This is the reason all exposure units sold on the >> market use >> the florescent tube. You can compensate somewhat by having the bulb >> not so >> close, but this just increases your exposure time. The other bad thing >> about >> the round bulb is the heat. This will actually get in the way of your >> process, depending upon what type of photo etch you are using. I am >> trying >> to recall if it was a problem caused to the developer or if it was a >> consistency problem in the exposure. Nevertheless, I found it to be a >> problem several years back. If you modify your design to use the >> florescent >> bulbs, you will notice a marked difference in detail as well as less >> exposure time needed. >> -Mike >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Hans Wedemeyer" <hans@...> >> To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> >> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 7:41 AM >> Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs >> >> >> > Leon, >> > good advice except for Easy-PC.... >> > I spent full price on that program and found I wasted my money. >> > Here's what I think of Easy-PC >> > http://hans-w.com/ezpcbugs.html >> > >> > I moved on to EAGLE and have been happy with it. It's STABLE does >> not >> > blow up cause me to lose work=time=money. >> > >> > A limited version of EAGLE is available for Free, it is limited to >> two >> > sided board and size check it out at >> > http://www.cadsoftusa.com >> > EAGLE has a VAST library of part and users add parts all the time. >> > Compared EAGLE parts Library to to Easy-PC several 1000 to 1 >> > >> > I put Easy-PC up for sale on eBay but none wanted it. In fact I put >> my >> > entire collection of Numberone product in the same auction >> > Filter program, Easy-PC for DOS and for Windows and the digital >> > simulator Pulsar. INo one reached my minimum Price of $200 ! It's >> still >> > here in a box onthe floor, I think I'll use the disks and CD's for >> > target practice sometime... >> > >> > Here's one thing that is not (was not)( they may have fixed it by >> now) >> > possible to do with Easy-PC for Wndows, in a situation where top and >> >> > bottom layers have parallel tracks sections that overlap, and a >> whole >> > bunch of closely spaced via's or other pads, it is not possible to >> put >> > the cursor on the trace/pad that I want for move/edit. It just snaps >> to >> > the nearest and of course that is not handy at all ! I can turn snap >> off >> > but that is not what it's all about. >> > EAGLE allows ANY pad/trace on any layer to be individually selected >> even >> > if they are overlapping. >> > >> > Pulsonix used to look like Easy-PC, I think they are the same >> bunch... >> > Although Pulsonix used to give the schematic editor away for free, >> the >> > PCB layout part is high $$$$ ! That's much like saying "this car is >> >> > free, but the special wheel cost $20,000 each " >> > >> > I'll get off my soap boix now... >> > >> > I make double side board all the time. I used to do it the way you >> > mentioned, and even wrote a program for my CNC mill to compensate >> for >> > alignment problems. >> > I found a better way by printing on transparencies and then aligning >> >> > them visually, then stapling them together. Then slide the board in >> > between the transparencies and sandwich the whole lot between two >> plates >> > of glass, and place the sandwich between two lamps >> > http://hans-w.com/setupforexposure.jpg >> > and >> > http://hans-w.com/twolampexposure.jpg >> > Credit for this sandwich idea goes to >> > http://www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html >> > >> > Alignment between top and bottom is good. Perhaps the greatest >> problem >> > I've run into is the HP LaserJet making different print sizes when I >> >> > mirror the one side. >> > I used to worry about getting the printed side of the transparency >> close >> > to the PCB, after testing with 5 mil lines I decided there is NO >> need to >> > mirror. Using the exposure as I how in my photo it allows me to do 5 >> mil >> > lines all day everyday. >> > >> > Thanks for all the tips. >> > Best Regards >> > Hans Wedemeyer >> > >> > >> > Leon Heller wrote: >> > >> > > I've been making my own PCBs at home for about 40 years, starting >> by >> > > painting the pattern onto single-sided PCB material using a fine >> > > paintbrush and cellulose paint, with ferric chloride or ammonium >> > > persulphate etchant. I used 0.1" graph paper for designing the >> layout >> > > then marked the holes with a centre punch through the paper onto >> the >> > > copper surface. I even made a couple of double-sided PCBs using >> this >> > > technique, by masking off one side, etching the other side, >> drilling >> > > it, >> > > and using the drill holes as a guide when painting on the resist >> on >> > > the >> > > second side. I then masked off the first side with tape to etch >> the >> > > second side. >> > > >> > > When low-cost CAD software became available (I used Easy-PC from >> > > Number >> > > One Systems for years) I progressed to printing 2:1 artwork on a >> dot >> > > matrix printer. I then got a local litho platemaking company to >> > > produce >> > > a 1:1 positive transparency that I used with a home-made UV >> exposure >> > > unit and resist-coated PCB material. When I got an ink jet printer >> I >> > > found that I could get reasonable results by printing 1:1 artwork >> onto >> > > >> > > tracing paper. >> > > >> > > I now use an old LaserJet IIIp I picked up very cheaply to print >> 1:1 >> > > onto LaserStar film and expose the PCBs in a home-made UV exposure >> >> > > unit. >> > > I sometimes use tracing paper (nice and cheap), but find that I >> get >> > > better results from the LaserStar film. The CAD software I use is >> > > Pulsonix, a professional package out of the same stable as >> Easy-PC. I >> > > regularly use 12/12 design rules, occasionally going down to 10 >> mils >> > > if >> > > I need to route tracks between IC pads. Rather than conventional >> > > positive-resist FR4 PCB material, I usually use something called >> > > FPC-16 >> > > which consists of a sandwich of compressed paper between thin >> layers >> > > of >> > > fibreglass. It's cheaper than FR4 and much easier to cut and >> drill. >> > > It's >> > > available from Mega Electronics, as is the LaserStar film. >> > > >> > > Etching is in ferric chloride. I place the etchant in a small >> plastic >> > > food container inside a larger container half-filled with hot >> water >> > > and >> > > continuously agitate the etchant manually by rocking the >> container. >> > > Etching typically takes 5-10 minutes. >> > > >> > > I'm quite pleased with the results. I intend to experiment with >> > > double-sided boards by making a UV exposure unit that can expose >> both >> > > sides of the PCB simultaneously. With a better printer and vacuum >> on >> > > the >> > > UV exposure unit I think I could get 8 mil tracks quite reliably. >> I've >> > > >> > > heard of other people managing it at home. >> > > >> > > Here is an example of one of my PCBs: >> > > >> > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller/pcb.html >> > > >> > > I often use the Pulsonix copper pour facility for this type of >> board, >> > > as >> > > it makes the routing easier. Cross-hatching is better with a laser >> >> > > printer, as they don't tend to print large black areas very well. >> > > >> > > Links: >> > > >> > > Mega Electronics: http://www.megaelect.demon.co.uk/ >> > > Number One Systems: http://www.numberone.com/ >> > > Pulsonix: http://www.pulsonix.com/ >> > > >> > > Leon >> > > -- >> > > Leon Heller, G1HSM >> > > leon_heller@... >> > > http://www.geocities.com/leon_heller >> > > >> > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor >> > ADVERTISEMENT >> > [Click Here!] >> > >> > > >> > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and >> files: >> > > >> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs >> > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >> > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of >> Service. >> > >> > >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> > >> > >> > >> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and >> files: >> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs >> > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >> > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> > >> > >> > >> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to >> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ >> > >> >> >> >> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor > > > >> >> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: >> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com >> >> >> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. > > >[Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > >Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: >http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > >To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: >Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] How I make my PCBs
2003-05-18 by Stefan Trethan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.