I am using autorouter for complex boards. It would be nightmare to manually route something like high speed 32 bit databus and preserve signal integrity... I have another opinion: since 4 layer PCBs are almost as cheap as 2 layer few years ago, I am using 4 layers for higher densitiy PCBs. Just put power planes in the mid layers and let the autorouter do the boring job... M. David McNab pravi: > > Hi, > > I've been using Eagle for my PCBs, mainly on the strengths of its > above-average user interface, the good component libraries (made better > by user contributions) , but especially its autorouter. > > The autorouter is a pain, but gets the job done. Even if sometimes I > need to tweak some of the parameters, and manually move traces around a > bit after the job's done. > > For me, the autorouter is a $deity$-send. I just don't have the patience > to lay out traces manually. > > Some questions here: > - do people here consider it lame to use autorouting? > - are there any other free PCB design progs that have autorouting? > - can eagle (or any other free progs) do auto-placement? > - is Eagle the best of the free PCB design progs? > > Cheers > David > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Autorouting and auto-placement
2007-01-12 by Marko Pavlin (home)
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.