--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "John Craddock" <John.Craddock@...> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: derekhawkins [mailto:eldata@...] > > Sent: 26 September 2006 00:18 > > To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com > > Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: UV Light Sources > Snip > > Craddock must have at least searched > > these archives for >mercury vapor< before starting this thread. Flags > > raise when "people play the fool to catch the wise", begging the > > question "What's his MO?". > > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Andrew" > > <andrewm1973@> wrote: > Derek > FYI in the English language we spell "vapor" as vapour, so a search missed it; sorry we don't have any American schools in OZ. Your insinuation in the snide comment above is pretty dammed offensive and totally uncalled for in a list such as this. FYI my "MO" is that over here a 250 watt mercury "vapour" globe of the self-ballasting variety costs AU$36 including the ceramic holder. Otoh 4 uv fluorescent tubes plus the control gear to go with them costs 5 times that amount. SAVING MONEY IS MY "MO". > Regards > John C Please watch your language and your temper. FYI, that's American English.... ;') Derek, I must have missed something, I wasn't picking up any ulterior (ulteriour?) motives. Steve Greenfield
Message
Re: UV Light Sources
2006-09-26 by Steve
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.