I cannot pinpoint why its slow. As I posted ealier I got a piece of clean copper in fresh 20% HCl and completely dissolved it in little over 3 hours to end up with deep green colored solution. You can see from the picture that air supply was extremely vigorous so the test dosn't represent a practical situation. It became warm (20\ufffdC above ambient) during its peak because of the heat generated by the reaction. Unfortunately its been a slow week with your setup, and I can understand your frustration. I haven't yet done a direct comparison between the use of large bubbles and fine bubbles and how it effects the reaction rate. Maybe there is a 100:1 difference ???. On a more theoretical thought, the surface area/volume ratio of a bubble (assuming perfect sphere) is proportional to 1/r. For equal volume of air 1 mm bubbles would give 10 times surface area than 10 mm bubbles. Any foaming on the surface would also dramatically increase air contact area. Small bubbles are much more effective at creating foam than large bubbles. Its expected for splashes to jump out of the tank, you should have a lid on. Virtually all the oxygen source is from the air bubbles, not the surrounding air. Adam grantfair2001 wrote: > To put the HCl fume problem in perspective - I had been bubbling the > etchamt solution with an open tank for over a week without any HCL > damage, even on steel a few feet away. > > It was only when I started aerating with a much higher volume pump > that the problem appeared. The etchant surface was so agitated that it > was spitting some etchant out of the tank - and into the air. And the > bigger compressor got warm enough that the air was being warmed, and > increasing the temperature of the etchant. I understand a higher > temperature alone may cause fuming. > > I believe the CuCl approach can be used without any fume damage, even > without a fume exhaust. > > As to the slow process, this is in part due to my air sparger making > largish bubbles. If I got an aquarium air stone the process would > probably be much faster. > > Grant > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan > <stefan_trethan@g...> wrote: > > >>i really believe with this cost / etch i won't start the bubbling > > campaign. > >>this seems much to high effort (concerning the corrosive fuem > > discussion also). > >>regards >>st > > > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] CuCL too much effort ?
2003-04-29 by Adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.