> > Me wrote: > >The kalex box has light and dark patches. > Tubes are probably spaced too far apart. My guess too. > I started with this; > http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/52324065 > Then went to this to ensure that would never > be a problem; > http://www.pbase.com/eldata/image/52321530 Now that would have to be pretty even illumination > I'm not a fan of UV tubes as you can see. > In fact the only UV tube here is in a 28 > year old EPROM eraser. AFAIK there are 3 common types of UV tube. The generic part numbers for these start GT, BL and BB. That is for GT - Germicidal = Nasty UV BL - Black light = Bug zappers BB - Black blue = Disco lights The two second sort (BL and BB) are abouts the peak sensitivity of UV resist (at least kinsten brand) With some playing I did with them the exposure times with normal white fluros was significantly longer. Theory I have read says that a shorter exposure leads to better line deffinition. This may be bunk - I don't know. The white tubes doubling as a light box is a good idea if you do go that way. I woudl imagine the number of tubes Derek has would lead to pretty short exposures anyways. BTW - the GT tubes are no good for PCB exposure either. They are too short a wavelength. They are only good for EPROMS, killing bacteria, making ozone and going blind. BL and BB tubes can obviously be looked at with no ill effects apart from those you would get from drinking to much while sitting on the patio or at the disco.
Message
Re: UV exposure boxes
2006-09-15 by Andrew
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.