Hello Max I have been attempting a similar process for producing double sided plated through holes, and I can not agree with you more about it being a long and involved system than first meets the eye. I am far from the stage of being able to make a reliable board in relatively short time. As you probably know there is a *LOT* to learn especially if your mixing and analyzing your own chemistry. To answer you question on tin plating resist compatible enchants then I should tell you what I've found. I am using electrolytic tin as the metal resists primarily for low toxicity of the plating solution, compared to standard fluroborate tin/lead solder plating baths. The tin bath is stannous sulfate/sulfuric acid/brighteners which I assume is what you are using. According to the popular Coombs' PCB handbook. I read that FeCl3 etchants attack all common plated metals except gold, so I didn't even try etching with this. I also read that CuCl2 etching attacks tin and solder plating resists and again never attempted using such an etchant. The Coombs' PCB handbook stated several etchants that were use for tin plated boards. Two of these included persulfate etching and hydrogen peroxide/sulfuric acid. I extensively tested the ammonium persulfate compatibility with tin plated boards and found that the tin is slowly etched during the period of time it took for the copper to etch. The results were random and some areas it would etch completely through while other areas just made the tin black and discolored. It was not reliable enough. The Coombs' book mentioned phosphoric acid (20-50g/l) as an additive to the persulfate etchant , but I only found it to improve the tin resistant slightly in bubble etching and the tin was black and awful looking after etching. http://www.thinktink.com/ is a company selling lab equipment for producing PCBs. One process includes making tin only pattern plated boards and etching with H2O2/H2SO4. I sent them a letter asking about the results of the etching and they said the tin is black and discolored after etching, and must be plated quite thick( > 10 um) for it to work. I wasn't happy with that answer and so didn't bother to try H2O2/H2SO4. Another problem with tin plate corrosion , even if it doesn't completely corrode through, is that the electrochemical reaction between the copper and tin metals can cause a large variation in the etch rate at vicinity of the tin/copper interface. Spray etching will solve the uneven etch rate problem due to electrochemical reactions. More research lead me the the ammonical alkaline etchants. The etchant that was most interesting to me was sulfate based ammoniac etchant. This etchant contains ammonia (for a pH > 10)/ copper sulfate (1.0 Molar) and ammonium sulfate (0.5 Molar). The problem with this etchant is the ammonia must be very high for appreciable etching rates at room temperature and therefore can only be used in a closed container. It also must be stored sealed when not used for long periods or slow loss of ammonia will occur. Even tin plating thickness of just 1 um are completely untouched by this etchant, and retain its bright mirror finish, even after long periods in solution (10 times longer than etch copper time). This etchant can be directly regenerated by electricity using stainless steel electrodes. The anodes are permanently installed in the tank which are used during electrolytic regeneration. See, http://www.elo-chem.com for commercial etching machines using this etching chemistry. The most common etchant for tin plating resists used in PCB shops is the ammonical chloride. This chloride etchant is much faster the sulfate version and does not need such high pH (<8.3) and ammonia can be reduced to a level where it doesn't fume. Some quick experiments with this etchant showed it to have only a minimal effect on the tin, it therefore may not be good enough for bubbles etchants because the electrochemical effect. I have not tired this and so cannot be certain. The higher the pH the lower electrochemical potential difference bweteen copper and tin. Adam Max Davies wrote: > Hi everyone. > > A newbie to this group, I am (perhaps over-ambitiously) attempting > to set up a micro through-hole plating line at home. It's a lot > more involved than I ever thought it would be, but I now have most > of it working fine. ...Except what should be the easy bit - the > final stage - the etching! > > > To give a brief description of what I do... > > STAGE 1: Starting with plain, copper-clad board, I do the drilling. > STAGE 2: Apply photopolymer laminate, then expose & develop. (This > is positive photopolymer, so the copper which will ultimately become > tracks is exposed to the air on developing the pattern) > STAGE 3: Go through a 6-stage process to electroless-plate the > entire thing (including the holes & edges). The copper cover it puts > on is pretty thin, but uniform at 1-2 microns. > STAGE 4: Electroplate the copper - this gives reasonable thickness > to the copper applied in stage 3 - I aim for 25 microns. > STAGE 5: Electroplate with tin to 10 microns. This > (theoretically!) protects the copper from etchant. > STAGE 6: Remove remaining resist. Then etch. This should leave > the tin-plated areas untouched, everything else should be zapped. > > > But alas no! Stage 6 fails, because both tin *and* copper are > etched, leaving me with a fine, blank piece of fibreglass! It > matters not whether I use Ferric Chloride or Sulphuric/Peroxide > etchant - they both destroy what has been so lovingly created!! So > I reckon there must be something awry with my tin plating. > > It's a total impasse, and nothing I do, from increasing/decreasing > current to re-formulating the tin plating bath according to > manufacturer's instructions seems to change things. > > Does anyone else use a similar process, or have any clue about what > might be the problem here? > > Max. > > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] tin plate compatable etchants
2003-04-27 by adam Seychell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.