Liam/Tom/Mike Thanks all for your suggestions. It sounds as if there are several routes I could go from here. Liam - your suggestion of a different type of etchant sounds like an obvious one to try. I see you're UK based - can you direct me to a UK supplier of this etchant and I'll give it a go. In fact my process is an industrial one (www.vantage.co.uk) - I have tried to stick with just one supplier to have half a chance of making it work! Tom - It is electro-tin (I tried immersion tin before, and quickly realized the limitations!) The surface is matt by design - does that sound like white tin? In fact, since my post, I have managed to get a persistent coating, but it has required a *ridiculous* thickness of tin - a step of some 100 microns, and of course with an appalling surface topology. It should definitely require less than this! I didn't know you could plate solder - I'd always seen solder as a substance to be applied molten (therefore melting the resist). It's definitely an avenue to look into if I remain unsuccessful with the tin. My catalyst is indeed Palladium based. Your suggestion of missing out the e/less copper is alluring - the fewer baths the better. How does this work? Thanks again all. Max. --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Putnam" <circuit@g...> wrote: > I have to differ with you, Tom. I used Tin Plate (Electrolysis) in my shop > for many years and not Gold. Gold plating was too expensive. I etched with > Ferric Chloride with no problems ever. Perhaps the trick is in how fast you > are able to etch the panel. > -Mike > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "twb8899" <twb8899@y...> > To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2003 11:40 AM > Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Oh no, blank fibreglass again! > > > > Max, > > > > We always used solder plating as a resist and it worked fine. After > > etching either reflow the solder or strip it off and apply one of the > > newer "white tin" coatings if you want tin plating. Are you using > > immersion tin or really electroplating it? Immersion tin is worthless > > as a metallic resist but some electroplated tins will work if they > > are plated heavy enough. By switching to solder plating you will > > eliminate the problem. The same plating bath can probably be used. > > > > Ferric chloride will not work unless gold is being used as the etch > > resist. Sulfuric/peroxide will work as an etchant for solder plated > > boards. After stripping the photoresist dip the panel in a 10% > > peroxide dip and then etch. This keeps the black crud from forming on > > the solder plated surface for a better reflow finish. After etching > > dip the panels in a 10% hydrochloric acid dip for about five minutes > > to brighten the solder plating for reflow. Skip the peroxide and > > hydrochloric dips if the solder is being stripped after etching. They > > are only required for solder reflow quality. > > > > Bake the boards for at least 30 minutes at 300 degrees F after > > etching and before reflowing. This is for outgassing any trapped > > moisture and will keep the plated through holes from blowing out when > > soldering. > > > > BTW, are you using the newer activated palladium cataylyst and > > skipping the electroless copper stage? Good luck on your new system! > > > > Tom > > > > > > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Max Davies" <max.davies@b...> > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone. > > > > > > A newbie to this group, I am (perhaps over-ambitiously) attempting > > > to set up a micro through-hole plating line at home. It's a lot > > > more involved than I ever thought it would be, but I now have most > > > of it working fine. ...Except what should be the easy bit - the > > > final stage - the etching! > > > > > > > > > To give a brief description of what I do... > > > > > > STAGE 1: Starting with plain, copper-clad board, I do the drilling. > > > STAGE 2: Apply photopolymer laminate, then expose & develop. (This > > > is positive photopolymer, so the copper which will ultimately > > become > > > tracks is exposed to the air on developing the pattern) > > > STAGE 3: Go through a 6-stage process to electroless-plate the > > > entire thing (including the holes & edges). The copper cover it > > puts > > > on is pretty thin, but uniform at 1-2 microns. > > > STAGE 4: Electroplate the copper - this gives reasonable thickness > > > to the copper applied in stage 3 - I aim for 25 microns. > > > STAGE 5: Electroplate with tin to 10 microns. This > > > (theoretically!) protects the copper from etchant. > > > STAGE 6: Remove remaining resist. Then etch. This should leave > > > the tin-plated areas untouched, everything else should be zapped. > > > > > > > > > But alas no! Stage 6 fails, because both tin *and* copper are > > > etched, leaving me with a fine, blank piece of fibreglass! It > > > matters not whether I use Ferric Chloride or Sulphuric/Peroxide > > > etchant - they both destroy what has been so lovingly created!! So > > > I reckon there must be something awry with my tin plating. > > > > > > It's a total impasse, and nothing I do, from increasing/decreasing > > > current to re-formulating the tin plating bath according to > > > manufacturer's instructions seems to change things. > > > > > > Does anyone else use a similar process, or have any clue about what > > > might be the problem here? > > > > > > Max. > > > > > > > > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > > Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > >
Message
Re: Oh no, blank fibreglass again!
2003-04-26 by Max Davies
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.