> Derek wrote: > <snip> > Assuming you're already using the > highest toner density setting, you > could try the solvent fumigation > trick or one of those sprays like > Laser Buddy. Most of us just switch > to Inkjet to solve that problem. Never heard of fumigation trick or laser buddy - I will google them both now. I have an endless supply of inkjets and ink for them (I have a friend that imports and sells bottled ink systems for epson and canon printers). I always liked the sharp edge of the laser better. Guess I can give an inky a try though. >> The big laserprinter I borrow works >> well for large black areas - but it >> is a half hour ride to get to use. > > Which model printer is this? Fuji Xerox one which I think uses the technology they aquired with tektronics. It's a big true 1200dpi colour laser that I think costs as much as a small car. It's 4 and a bit foot tall, 4 foot wide and 3 foot deep. Makes my little LJ4000 look like a pocket sized portable. Does a very very nice job on vellum. Incredibly black and no pin holes in sight. > <snip> >> I am going to build a think and tinker style >> collimated box - but I don't think it is >> going to make a noticeable improvement. > > Just add a collimation grid to an existing > lightbox, waste of time though, it's not > going to solve your opacity problem nor is > it going to address any issues you may have > in the .005" - .010" range IMO. My current light box is a breifcase style kinsten one. The lamps are too close in the breifcase style boxes and I get uneven exposure. SO I want to build a better one anyways. No harm in putting in the collimating grid while I am building it I think :D Hopefully the laser plotter will solve the opacity problem. And I think all my sub 8 thou problems are photo tool related.
Message
Re: 6/6 Rules (.006" lines and .006" spacing)
2006-06-26 by Andrew
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.