Yahoo Groups archive

Homebrew PCBs

Index last updated: 2026-04-05 19:38 UTC

Message

[Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Note to Pulsar paper users

2006-06-13 by Robert Hedan

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com 
> [mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De la part de lcdpublishing
> Envoyé : juin 13 2006 13:53
> À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Note to Pulsar paper users
> 
> 
> Hi Robert, I found that the "New and Improved" stuff is horrid by 
> comparison to the original.  I went through two packages before 
> getting a good transfer.  I emailed back and forth with the fellow 
> at Pulsar and also asked for replacement material.  At that point, 
> the person stopped communicating with me.  As far as I am concerned, 
> I won't buy anything else with their name on it.  
> 
> I am not a happy camper with regard to their products


Yup, confirmed.

It now takes a complete sheet to make a double-sided PCB; 1/2 sheet per
side.  I used to be able to cut to exact size and "piggy-back" the older
white sheet onto ordinary paper.  I can't do that any more, it jams, I'm
forced to pass the new blue sheet alone.  And I can't cut it down to
narrower strips 'cause my printer needs a minimum length of paper to bridge
between the sets of drive rollers.

The increase in thickness also means standard PCB is now out of the question
through the laminator.  I also had 2 incomplete transfers out of 3, with
problems at all stages of the process.  I'm very disappointed with this new
& improved stuff also.  Time and costs have gone up, inconsistent results as
well as new problems throughout the process.

The direct-printing process has just taken a new priority on my TO DO list.
I was quite happy using the Pulsar material but this is ridiculous.

Robert
:(

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.