Hi Robert, I found that the "New and Improved" stuff is horrid by comparison to the original. I went through two packages before getting a good transfer. I emailed back and forth with the fellow at Pulsar and also asked for replacement material. At that point, the person stopped communicating with me. As far as I am concerned, I won't buy anything else with their name on it. I am not a happy camper with regard to their products --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan <robert.hedan@...> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I've been using this product to make my PCBs until now and having > > excellent results. Unfortunately, the concept of "new & improved" seems > > to be spreading to other companies besides Yahoo. Pulsar has switched > > from the white paper-like sheet to something more like photo paper; it is > > thicker and more opaque. > > > > My 1st sheet got jammed in the printer (1st paper jam ever on this unit) > > and alignment of double-sided PCBs is harder. My ordinary fluorescent > > lamp used to be plenty to align the old white version but is now just > > barely ok for this new blue version. I did not notice any improvement > > during the transfer process and the Pulsar greenTRF paper did not stick > > better to the toner either (I think I'm not cleaning the residue from the > > paper completely before this step, need more practice). > > > > Personally I consider this a step back and really hope they would > > reconsider and keep the older version available. I'm going to write to > > them and report back what they have to say. > > > > Robert > > :) > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >
Message
Re: Note to Pulsar paper users
2006-06-13 by lcdpublishing
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.