--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Alan King <alan@...> wrote:
printers. I -think- that for a given DPI setting the droplet size
stays the same, but for higher resolutions it uses smaller droplets
with heavier coverage.
My old Canon BJC 6000 does two sets of nozzle checks, one very light
and thin. I think it's testing at two different droplet sizes.
movement of the paper/head. Fine for photos, not as much use for
lineart such as PCBs.
Note that most Epsons are 720x1440, or 720x2880, and aren't there some
that claim 1440x5760?
Steve Greenfield
>Not exactly. There are variable drop sizes in many new desktop inkjet
> Pretty sure that inkjet firing is pretty much a go/no go process, not
> metered. Any form of metering is either more/less shots in one spot or
> lower resolution.
printers. I -think- that for a given DPI setting the droplet size
stays the same, but for higher resolutions it uses smaller droplets
with heavier coverage.
My old Canon BJC 6000 does two sets of nozzle checks, one very light
and thin. I think it's testing at two different droplet sizes.
> Judging by the claimed 5700+ DPI resolutions on someYes, the heads are still the same 720dpi print heads, it's the
> of their printers I'd say they're claiming everything including the
> mostly overlapping dots and anything short of Vivid setting is less
> shots and resolution.. Of course draft is minimal to be able to read
> ok, so likely less than even the least setting on the normal color
> settings and probably has gaps..
movement of the paper/head. Fine for photos, not as much use for
lineart such as PCBs.
Note that most Epsons are 720x1440, or 720x2880, and aren't there some
that claim 1440x5760?
Steve Greenfield