The 300 DPI "blocky" or coarsely dithered graphics from my HP LJ IIIP is why I donated it to FreeCycle and bought the Brother 2040. Tough tradeoff, since the Brother is certainly not optimally suited for toner transfer. It works nicely for bulk printing, though, and I don't have to use up ink on my Canon i860 Inkjet. Maybe I should have kept the IIIP and converted it to a fuser-type laminator unit, Stefan, but at that time, I didn't know about that particular option. Ted --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...> wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:14:09 +0200, ballendo <ballendo@...> wrote: > ---snip--- > > The 300 DPI of my IIID was not enough for TT, for me, for the 0.5mm TQFPs. > > > IOW, is there some thing that these older laser printers do "better" > > > > or are my newer HP 1100's gonna be equal or superior in every way? > > They are superior in the way that they probably still work when the newer > printers are thrown away. > I bought the replacement paper path paths for my IIID for 1eur recently, > will get it up to "as new" one of these days for general printing. I have > plenty of toner, and usually replacement cartridges go for 1eur at ebay > for this printer, so it is very cheap to run. It is more than enough for > text printing and stuff for me. ---snip--- > The fuser uses a relatively thin roller, but i think some here have tried > this fuser assy, hopefully they comment. > > ST
Message
Re: HP Laserjet series II (any value to toner transfer or ???)
2006-04-22 by kilocycles
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.